Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt any self-hosted service is going to be more reliable than gmail.
Going on 11 years here with no real issues.
Or maybe you have so few users, that when it does go down no one notices?
Gmail.com was down
291–300 of 322 posts
Re: Gmail.com was down
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chromium crash on Arch Linux with this message: http://pastebin.com/f9JMsPzT terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): bitset::set [1] 4934 abort (core dumped) chromium singing out of sync for now.. Edit: no crashes since I signed out of sync Edit2: found a more complete stack trace by somebody else: https://gist.github.com/4251938 Bug Report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/…
Wow, a lot of people use Chromium over Chrome because of "omg botnet" - I wonder why Google downtime would cause vanilla Chromium to crash?
They do? I thought they just disliked undebuggable proprietary plugins.
Re: Gmail.com was down
#293Re: Gmail.com was down
#294Re: Gmail.com was down
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chromium crash on Arch Linux with this message: http://pastebin.com/f9JMsPzT terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): bitset::set [1] 4934 abort (core dumped) chromium singing out of sync for now.. Edit: no crashes since I signed out of sync Edit2: found a more complete stack trace by somebody else: https://gist.github.com/4251938 Bug Report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/…
Wow, a lot of people use Chromium over Chrome because of "omg botnet" - I wonder why Google downtime would cause vanilla Chromium to crash?
I thought Chromium still had all the google tie-in issue. If I remember correctly what they pulled out was license encumbered features like font rendering. I know there were forks like iron that pull out the privacy features.
Re: Gmail.com was down
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chromium crash on Arch Linux with this message: http://pastebin.com/f9JMsPzT terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): bitset::set [1] 4934 abort (core dumped) chromium singing out of sync for now.. Edit: no crashes since I signed out of sync Edit2: found a more complete stack trace by somebody else: https://gist.github.com/4251938 Bug Report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/…
Wow, a lot of people use Chromium over Chrome because of "omg botnet" - I wonder why Google downtime would cause vanilla Chromium to crash?
Google services use SPDY connections. I wonder if it has a bug in its implementation... not many sites use the protocl.
Re: Gmail.com was down
#297Re: Gmail.com was down
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, outlook.com / live.com email is pretty nice nowadays. I'm tempted to forward my personal gmail stuff there for a while to see how it holds up.
Or you could go for a paid service without the ads. And we don't sell your data :) http://fastmail.fm /bias
gmail sells your data?
Re: Gmail.com was down
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe you have so few users, that when it does go down no one notices?
Monitoring is a beautiful thing.
So you're telling me that in 11 years, your server has never been down, even for a reboot, software update or hardware failure?
Going on 11 years here with no real issues.
Define "no real issues" cos I would define GMail going down for some users in parts of the world for a short period of time as "no real issue".
Re: Gmail.com was down
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that the article/video is from last March. http://www.theonion.com/search/?q=google+gmail
That's about the right amount of time for reality to imitate parody.
Obligatory:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/fuck-everything-were-doing-... February 2004
http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2005-09-14/gillettes-fiv... September 2005