Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is only true of semantically equivalent things. Tabs vs spaces don't matter they are equivalent. But consistency is only better when it is an improvement. It is fundamentally important that convential commit is better for adopting it to be an improvement. After all in your example wasting the first four characters of your commits with poop would objectively reduce the quality of your commit history, whether or n…
> It is fundamentally important that convential commit is better for adopting it to be an improvement. Absolutely! Which means we can also agree that conventional commit is objectively better than No System For Their Commits At All, which is what 99.9% of people are actually choosing between when evaluating conventional commit. They aren’t looking at conventional commit vs Some Better Way, they are looking at “we hav…
I was quite clear you are presupposing it is better without actually justifying that.
"Some standard is better than no standard" isn't generally true, it has some requirements.