Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

sourceforge.net

291–300 of 526 posts

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#291

if michalesoft wants to take away our ability to sign drivers, they will find there is more than enough vulnerable easily exploited drivers we can use that are pre-signed online. Thank you micosawft!

Are you having a stroke?

I think it's a reference to Michaelsoft Binbows :)

https://alf-s-room.com/etc/nandarou/binbows/binbows_english....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRIklga9IBQ

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#292
post #6

They need to get some tech site like Arstechnica to write about it, like they did when neocities couldn't get ahold of bing. The only way to contact these tech companies to speak to a real human being and not a chatbot is if you know somebody who works there or if the media writes about it.

Isn't this Microsoft abusing their quasi-monopoly as a consumer PC OS vendor? If it weren't for the current administration, I'd say it's time for regulatory action.

> If it weren't for the current administration

Because the Democrats were better at keeping them on a leash? No. Clinton was in charge 30 years ago and blew it.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

EU is currently on its way to introduce mandatory age verification everywhere.

If I understand them correctly, the proposals are quite different. The US is effectively requiring the implementation of a third party verification service at computer set-up. The EUs approach validates an existing cryptographic identity that says you are over a certain age, without exposing your identification.

Please correct me if I am wrong, this is what I read here.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#294
post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

and yet... still unusable by the mass majority of people.

Linux is stuck because it's made and maintained by people who love linux. Look at popular unix based OS's - Android, MacOS, iOS.. Whats the first thing they do? Take the command line out back and shoot it. Whereas for linux users, their is this l33t h4cker festishization of only using a keyboard to do everything. All these distros have an extremely robust CLI under the hood, and an afterthought quasi GUI on the surfa…

>Just good enough for grandma to check her email and watch youtube.

Which is 90% of the use of a computer. And Steam is taking care of the other 10%.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#295
post #40
post #4

It's like LibreOffice all over again: https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-bans-libreoffice-devel...

This is worrying on many levels. So Microsoft force you to create an account to use Windows and then they reserve the right to block you from your own account, thereby potentially making you lose access to all your OWN data. This is crazy and yet another reason to stop using Windows as soon as possible.

Google and Apple have been doing this for a long time, and Microsoft clearly got jealous.

Their first big win was when they banned the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court from accessing any of the court's documents, then deleted all of those documents. Now they're going after slightly less important enemies of the state. That bar will continue to drop as long as it's allowed to. And let's not kid ourselves: if you develop or use encryption software that Mossad can't break, you are an enemy of the state.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Speculation as well and highly unlikely. Microsoft drivers can very well BSOD your machine as well, not a significant or convincing threat scenario and certainly not something that lead to certificate revocation of driver developers. There is zero quality control or review by Microsoft here. Not for their own products and not for third party ones.

That's not entirely true. Certain classes of signing keys require driver developers to put their driver through a test battery and submit the results to Microsoft.

I wish Microsoft expanded and built on that model, instead of moves like firing swarthes of their QA staff.

It could have grown into a massive, self-service testing playground where any developer could submit their product and put it through an arsenal of basic, automated evaluations (e. does uninstall leave tidbits behind?), with paid upgrades to more tailored services. They could even publish scores to help consumers coarsely compare workmanship across different vendors, and encourage an emphasis on quality across the whole ecosystem.

Instead they decided to just become overpaid bouncers who take your money, check your ID, and don't even bother about what you bring through the door.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#297
post #85

Honest question, did we ever get an answer what was the cause for the sudden change from the original Truecrypt developer? Even if one doesn't want to maintain that project for purely private reasons, recommending Bitlocker as the drop-in-replacement always made it smell fishy to me.

Agreed, that whole thing was suspicious. I still use TrueCrypt, because of the suspicious nature of how it all went down.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#299
post #146
post #115

Linux is the only hope at this point for the future of computing. Windows and macOS are just too risky to do any business with. Waste of all resources.

and yet... still unusable by the mass majority of people.

My wife (former Sales Person and Manager) has used Linux for many, many years and prefers it over Windows.

Re: Microsoft terminated the account VeraCrypt used to sign Windows drivers

#300

We need a better way to sign and verify software. Clearly companies like Microsoft and Apple have not been good for the open source communities and are inhibiting innovation.

We need better OSes such that signing of software is not required to keep your computer safe.

Yes, I completely agree.
Post reply on HN