Live data from Hacker News

I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

twitter.com

291–300 of 1001 posts

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#291
And the White House, quoting Donald Trump: https://xcancel.com/WhiteHouse/status/2027497719678255148

"THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NEVER ALLOW A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY TO DICTATE HOW OUR GREAT MILITARY FIGHTS AND WINS WARS! That decision belongs to YOUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, and the tremendous leaders I appoint to run our Military.

The Leftwing nut jobs at Anthropic have made a DISASTROUS MISTAKE..." - President Donald J. Trump

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#292

This sounds like a message to would-be founders: don't base your company in the US. The strongest markets to do business are the ones with the most freedom from government meddling. In the US, big government is happy to use its power to crush private enterprise that it doesn't like.

Name one truly major market that is more business friendly

Singapore? The UK, apparently, since they don't do these things?

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#294

Trump's associated "Truth" ("Truth Social" is the name of his risible fake-Twitter and they call Tweets, "Truths" there) that preceded this: https://www.trumpstruth.org/statuses/36981 Don't worry, this is an archive/mirroring site for his account, not the actual TS site. I'd comment on how wackadoo this all is, but, 1) that applies to almost everything these days, and 2) the post's right there, see for yourself.

I really don't follow USA-politics besides the occasional hn-thread, random yt videos, and comments from friends...

With that said: what are the chances, in your opinion, that Donald wrote that himself?

To me it reads too coherent for there to be any chance he wrote or even dictated that.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The admin is clearly running out of steam yet you expect them to be able to get what they want next week after failing this week?

Ive been hearing this since 2016. Any day now.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#296

Good. I'd rather not have my favorite AI from a company working on AGI to have murder and spying in it's DNA. In fact, as a patriotic American veteran, I'd be ok with Anthropic moving to Europe. It might be better for Claude and AGI, which are overriding issues for me. Rutger Bregman @rcbregman This is a huge opportunity for Europe. Welcome Anthropic with open arms. Roll out the red carpet. Visa for all employees. Eu…

[flagged]

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#297
post #134

I’m just laughing at the possibility of it he US military being forced to use Chinese open source AI models because every US model provider refuses to work with them.

> because every US model provider refuses to work with them Zero percent chance of that happening as long as xAI exists.

WW3: Chinese army of intelligent bipeds vs USA waifu memes and based jokes.

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#298
post #275

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The real question we should be asking is what others HAVE agreed to. Has OpenAI just agreed to let the government go crazy with their models?

Can someone in plain terms explain what this is really about? Anyone can use Claude afaik?

I reached to answer but idk what you mean by the second question. Long story short, Department of “War” wants Anthropic to say theres no restrictions on their use of Claude, Anthropic wants to say you can’t use Claude for domestic mass surveillance or automating killing people domestically or in foreign countries. Rest is just complication. And don’t peer too closely at the “Do”W”” wants Anthropic to say $X, the Team Red line (or, whatever’s left of them publicly after this last year) is basically “you can’t tell the gov’t what it can and can’t do, that’s it, it’s not that Do”W” will use it for that”

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#299

Given that Anthropic is clearly risking their entire business just to stand up for what they believe is right, which appears to be what everyone here agrees with, is everyone who is supporting them here planning to also start using Anthropic and switch away from other vendors until they follow suit? Or are folks planning to just use whatever regardless? Edit: I should perhaps clarify I'm more interested in paid users…

i’m currently subscribed to openai for their $20 a month tier chatgpt subscription.

i told myself if anthropic does not back down on their current stipulations to the DoD, then i’d cancel and switch over to claude

they said there is a line they do not want to cross, and stuck to that stance, at great personal and financial risk to themselves

Re: I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a supply-chain risk

#300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The real question we should be asking is what others HAVE agreed to. Has OpenAI just agreed to let the government go crazy with their models?

> Altman says OpenAI agrees with Anthropic’s red lines in Pentagon dispute https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5758898-altman-backs-a...

He's probably lying. Or he "agrees" but will cross the line anyway.
Post reply on HN