There should be a minimum level of expertise or commitment to the truth so that publication who certainly think of themselves as major league or factual don't publish blatantly false statements like this. Yes, demand rose, and solar panels were installed whose capacity was about 60% of the new demand, but to say solar handled 60% of new capacity is blatantly false. As someone who owns solar panels, I'm painfully awar…
US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
291–300 of 346 posts
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#292While I'm concerned about the environmental challenges of reversing the trend and increasing energy consumption, I'm happy that people are living in more comfortable homes, that the Amercian industrial base is being restored, that more and better services are being provided (better healthcare, inexpensive and healthy food, comfortable, efficient and inexpensive transportation). That is what we're using this electrici…
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes in many parts of the US it's not just the heat but the humidity. One summer I tried going without AC as much as possible to see how much it would change my electric bill. I could handle the temperature most of the time but the humidity especially at night started giving me mold problems in the house. Cleaned that up and went back to using the AC and no more mold. Not sure how people controlled this back in the pr…
If you are OK with the heat maybe a dehumidifier would be able to address the humidity problem while still saving electricity compare to the AC.
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#294Why do people even pretend like we haven't signed up for "what's worse than the worse case scenario?" as far as climate goes?
The only way to reduce the already severe impacts of global warming are to keep fossil fuels in the ground. It doesn't matter how much energy is generated by solar so long as we continue to dig up and burn fossil fuels. It's quite clear that we have zero intentions of slowing down or even keeping our fossil fuel consumption steady.
If we had record electricity demand, and anything short of 100% of it was covered by renewables, that means we're burning more fossil fuels then we were before.
We have, pretty unequivocally at this point, signed up for seeing what the end game of civilization looks like rather than realistically exploring or even considering any alternatives.
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#295[0] https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/solar-met-61-of-us-...
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#296The cognitive dissonance around optimism regarding renewables and the fact that there are multiple military actions going on around the globe right now focused exclusively on extracting more fossil fuels from the ground is a bit much sometimes. Why do people even pretend like we haven't signed up for "what's worse than the worse case scenario?" as far as climate goes? The only way to reduce the already severe impacts…
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#297Here's a good podcast (with written transcript) about what's happening in Australia. https://www.volts.wtf/p/whats-the-real-story-with-australian The difference in the permitting process between Australia and US is staggering.
Australia is still highly dependent on coal. They’re not a prime example of how to decarbonize an electricity grid. If you want a good example, rather look at France!
It can be done.
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Batteries or Generators don’t just let you cook and stay warm when the power is out but do everything else such as keep food cold as well.
Do induction cooking tops work well on batteries (or generators)? IIRC our induction plate has two-phase power because it can pull more than 3.6kW.
I think part of the problem with whole home backups is that they tend to be sized to a maximum load that is unusual or could be avoided with some effort. And that providing a backup for the essentials you actually need is relatively cheap and uncomplicated if you make some modest sacrifices.
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
> What is NG good for? Mostly a myth by cooks that think it "heats faster" or "heats with a better distribution of heat". It is foolish, but many still think so. I personally believe that the only kind of cooking that benefits from NG are round-bottom woks. But they can be substituted by flat-bottom pans without problems.
I have a duxtop induction burner and I notice it gets hotspots where the coils are. I wonder if the breville control freak is worth the money or it has better granularity of its heating element. But yeah if I built a new house, I would have an induction top.
Re: US electricity demand surged in 2025 – solar handled 61% of it
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
Europe is so backwards when it comes to annual heat deaths that they manage to have more heat deaths per year than the US has gun deaths + heat deaths combined. You won't hear about that from Europeans though, it'd make them seem barbaric. 175,000 heat deaths per year in Europe according to the WHO. It's a staggering genocide of technological primitiveness. Imagine having millions of people die because you can't be b…
The temperature a few metres below ground level is consistently cool (approx. 15 celcius) year round. Could this be made the basis of an efficient cooling system?