Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh fascinating - so you're reviewing "your own" code in-PR, rather than reviewing it before PR submission? I can see that working! Feels weird, but I can see it being a reasonable adaptation to these tools - thanks! What about running services locally for manual testing/poking? Do you open ports on the Anthropic VM to serve the endpoints, or is manual testing not part of your workflow?
Yeah the commits that claude code generate are co-authored by claude@anthropic.com so i just open a PR to see the code. I have automatic per-PR dev environments for manual testing.
Claude Code On-the-Go
291–300 of 349 posts
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#292Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#293> Now I code from my phone. Except that you are doing anything else but coding here. Coding involves writing code, which isn't actually done by the author here.
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#294Does anyone know what the "Poke" service that this blog mentions is? I'm having trouble finding it on Google.
Maybe [1]? Sounds like ntfy.sh, but more… AI [1] https://poke.com/docs/developers/api/message-poke
Personally, I'd setup a Mattermost server and use its WebHooks for notifications. That's also more flexible (can send commands back to the bot, etc.)
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#295Author here! Thanks for checking it out. On the $210/month VM cost - fair point. For me it's worth it because I'm running multiple parallel agents throughout the day, but you could definitely do this cheaper with a smaller instance or spot pricing. The real bottleneck isn't typing on mobile - it's reviewing the output. I've found 2-3 parallel agents is my sweet spot before I can't keep up with reviewing PRs. Git work…
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah the commits that claude code generate are co-authored by claude@anthropic.com so i just open a PR to see the code. I have automatic per-PR dev environments for manual testing.
What hosting do you use for automatic per PR dev environments?
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#297Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
> we live under a system that is arranged for the sole benefit of the owners of capital, and have been convinced that this is an immutable state of affairs What alternative do you propose?
I would like to propose a cap on net worth. Realistically, if you have 300M, you and your direct family are settled for life. So, I want to propose 1B cap on net worth, if its more than that for 12 months straight, surplus goes to government, if your net worth is down after that, government obliges to return it partially to make it to 1B. People, who are eager building things and innovating, will keep building regard…
What do you think all that money you taxed from billionaires will do in the hands of the “government”, pay the bills for 12-24 months? Then what’s your plan after the government has spent it all? No amount of taxation can solve a spending problem.
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would SpaceX exist if your ideas were in charge?
it would. Some options why it should happen: 1. Assuming Elon is curious person, he will still build it out of curiosity. 2. Assuming Elon is not curios person, just power hungry, he will probably think its not worth building it, but someone else who is curious will build it eventually. This is even better, because when power hungry person owns such thing, they might use it for bad things as well (e.g. to gain more p…
Re: Claude Code On-the-Go
#300This is a pretty sophisticated setup. I particularly like how it uses Tailscale. I've been using the simpler but not as flexible alternative: I'm running Claude Code for web (Anthropic's version of Codex Cloud) via the Claude iPhone app, with an environment I created called "Everything" which allows all network access. (This is moderately unsafe if you're working with private source code or environment variables cont…
I'm surprised to see people getting value from "web sandbox"-type setups, where you don't actually have access to the source code. Are folks really _that_ confident in LLMs as to entirely give up the ability to inspect the source code, or to interact with a running local instance of the service? Certainly that would be the ideal, but I'm surprised that confidence is currently running that high.
I could imagine this working for a small number of branches/changes.