Live data from Hacker News

Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

washingtonpost.com

291–297 of 297 posts

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#291
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe he had some idea that his buddy ran away with and he attributed his success to his idea, while he was homeless? There was a whole TV show around a similar idea (Breaking Bad).

Im pretty certain that of plagiate software would include rejected students works whole swaths of the academic successful would be let go.

What were you actually trying to type? I can't figure it out.

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Academic success perhaps. The killer and Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor he killed, were in the same class at Instituto Superior Técnico (Portugal's leading engineering school). Loureiro had a distinguished career at MIT while the killer was homeless.

Jealousy is really the sickest of sins…

The medieval RC Church (proudly) taught that "Superbia mater malem est", "Pride is the mother of evil".

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#293

>ctrl-f "gun control" >0 results Never change, HN.

How did banning drugs work out? Alcohol?

These things are not equal. Weed doesn't kill tens of bystanders in an area a second. We can actually look at places that have banned guns and it's done amazing. The reason to not do this are extremely thin at best.

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#294
post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Graduate school violence == suicide?

Grad school students are often required to work ridiculous amounts of unpaid hours for their supervising faculty (well over 40 hrs/week, sometimes meaning 7 days a week). Their eventual graduation is implicitly or explicitly tied to the approval of these monstrous bosses. Source: some of my fellow, less fortunate grad students.

Sure. That is still not the scenario being described. That is every startup too.

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Graduate student violence is more common that it should be. For example, you hear about suicides every year. I can't help but suspect that sometimes it may be related to graduate school itself, which can be stressful and unforgiving, with minimal support, and where supervisors often hold both academic power over their students' futures and financial power over their livelihoods. (And switching supervisors, even at th…

>I can't help but suspect that sometimes it may be related to graduate school itself, which can be stressful and unforgiving, with minimal support, and where supervisors often hold both academic power over their students' futures and financial power over their livelihoods. I dropped out of a PhD -- took the master's I earned for coursework, did my quals so it would be clear I chose to leave, then took an "academic-is…

> they wanted people who could answer questions about the UI of Windows like "How do I enable this printer" that, having not used it for years

I moved from FAANG to general IT and this was one of the things that tripped me up for a time. Who the hell uses printers? A lot of people, it turns out.

Lowering the expectations made life a lot easier and happier. The pay is less, but I have no stress. I go home at the same time every day and never work after my end time. Worth it to me. Sorry you got jacked around.

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Im pretty certain that of plagiate software would include rejected students works whole swaths of the academic successful would be let go.

What were you actually trying to type? I can't figure it out.

I think the first "of" -> "if" makes it readable.

Re: Brown/MIT shooting suspect found dead, officials say

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are two types of broken clocks. One is always suspicious, the other thinks nothing ever happens. One is more often right than the other, but both are equally broken.

There's a world of difference between "nothing happens with 100% probability" and "nothing happens with 98% probability", even though they can look like the same thing when talking casually.

If you always say "it's 98% nothing", you're still broken because you'll err on the side of "nothing" in all cases where it's something. Your false negative rate would be 100%. For your statements to have any value, you'll have to get at least some of the 2% where it's something right.
Post reply on HN