Live data from Hacker News

Coursera to combine with Udemy

investor.coursera.com

291–300 of 395 posts

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried that out in my field of expertise, to calibrate my expectations. ChatGPT invented multiple references to non-existent but plausibly-titled papers written by me . I think of that when asking questions about areas I don’t know. That was about 18mo ago, so maybe this kind of hallucination is under control these days.

Turns out Gell-Mann amnesia applies to LLMs too.

LLMann amnesia?

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#293
post #83

I was a Udemy instructor for ~10 years selling tech courses but focused more on delivering courses through my own site for the last ~5-6 years. Something never felt right with how Udemy promoted courses. I used to have a top selling course there, selling thousands of copies a month and now it gets basically no sales but it's still one of the highest rated courses in that niche on their platform. It's just no longer r…

I also started teaching on Udemy in 2019 and even though the number of students was high, I quickly noticed that income was low and most enrolled students did not even start the courses they purchased (let alone complete them). I also decided to invest time and money in my own website/school and that was probably the best decision I've ever made. Also, I'm not sure most people know that Udemy was never profitable up…

I started writing a udemy course some time ago in a very weird specialty and then I saw the $5 promo days. I was planning to charge $50-100 for the course (in line with other training materials in the specialty), and I realized that this was incompatible with udemy's model.

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For the fundamentals, sure, but many of the top sellers are going to be on things like React, Next, etc.

And in ten years after react is forgotten about, there will still be companies actively hiring Java developers

See you in ten years! We're a hop, skip and a jump from one click automated conversion from every legacy Java app to web and electron desktop compatible code and we can just retire Java entirely. in 2025, Java is not the most performant. It does not run in the most places. it is not the easiest to write or reason about. its advantage over anything else is momentum and it's losing that too.

React is just a formalizatio of a UI update pattern that exists in every app ever made except the ones that are bad. Source: written a lot of java and nobody is currently paying enough to make it worth doing again.

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#296
post #83

I was a Udemy instructor for ~10 years selling tech courses but focused more on delivering courses through my own site for the last ~5-6 years. Something never felt right with how Udemy promoted courses. I used to have a top selling course there, selling thousands of copies a month and now it gets basically no sales but it's still one of the highest rated courses in that niche on their platform. It's just no longer r…

The bitter lesson here is that if you want to control a business you can not avoid or outsource marketing. It is a huge part of any trade and you have to bear the marketing cost. I totally understand the desire to avoid it and concentrate on the craft and to create. I tried and failed at it numerous times. I decided that I will not start a business if I do not have any partners who understand and are willing to engage in sales and marketing.

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#297
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "I also decided to invest time and money in my own website/school and that was probably the best decision I've ever made." Thanks for not jumping to self promotion, but I'm actually curious to see how you did it - would you mind sharing a link?

pikuma.com

How are the videos served?

Re: Coursera to combine with Udemy

#298
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, you're definitely not wrong. We see it all the time on GitHub. If a project hasn't gotten a new commit in 2 days then the project is claimed dead. The same thing with blogs in general. A post could be popular and ranked highly in 2020 but in 2025 it's not even ranked on a search engine, even if the content is still highly relevant and fully working. It's bad because you could have a 10+ year old site with 500+ p…

> If a project hasn't gotten a new commit in 2 days then the project is claimed dead. That is certainly true, those projects are effectively dead. They lack security updates, lack integrations with new platforms, lack support for new HW architectures, lack newer privacy guarantees, etc., etc.

Certainly that depends on the nature of the software. For instance, I don't expect some header-only library that does what it's supposed to do to ever need updating.
Post reply on HN