Live data from Hacker News

Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

quartr.com

291–300 of 317 posts

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#291

I have gone full on cash-only mode, people would freak out with the amount of fees they pay without knowing it. I only have debit card, no credit card at all, in many places AUD$0.30-$0.50c is added to the goods price on debit cards. With cash, many places are offering 5-15% off when buying with cash only which is awesome. If you are a gamer, you most have heard within the last 3-4 days now that Steam, Itch.io and ot…

The risk of deplatforming for many reasons should be deeply concerning all around. It's definitely concerning to say the least.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#292
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>" the only thing that makes credit cards a better proposition is being able to pay without having enough money in the bank" I am not sure it is a better proposition if one looks at staggering amounts of debt caused by credit cards

You don’t want to spend money you don’t have? Congrats, your credit score is trash and now you can’t rent a house (let alone buy).

Cut the BS please. I do not have to use CC when I do not have money and still have perfect credit score. Personally I do use my CC only when there is no other option and I pay it off immediately after making a purchase. My credit score is perfect and I've never spent using CC more than I have on my account.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, it's almost like porn isn't the problem, it's crime and chargebacks. All of those sites use high risk payment processors if they go through the major card networks.

I sincerely doubt that people are issuing chargebacks for Steam store purchases.

I think you misread my comment. I wasn't saying they did.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still get interest, it's really bad though. And the transaction fees are very low here (someone said 0.2% but I don't know) which should cover a lot of infrastructure, fraud and such.

Transaction fees have a great variation depending on which contract the business has with banks or payment providers. It's not a set percentage for a country. For example a large retailer with a huge number of transactions per day will have a deal for the lowest fees possible, and then those fees differ if the card is credit or debit, national or foreign, and between standard or premium cards, and private or business…

I don't know, my bank gives me good exchange rates, their online banking is well integrated into Swedish society, they issue my online ID even. I'm not spending enough on my card to go through the hoops, I just have a peasant VISA debit and a free MasterCard CC and I'm happy with the setup.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#295
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not being the #1 priority is very different than not caring at all. It may feel that way when trying to sell the alternative, but the merchant would still disagree at the end of the day. The alternative to new competition (which would probably also raise its rates as soon as it became popular enough) is regulation on the fees, as seen in Europe. This makes some sense as the problem is less with the capabilities of th…

The merchant would disagree, but the merchant is lying to themselves, haha. The tough lesson i had to learn was people’s stated preferences often don’t match their revealed preferences. I really wanted it to be true so i gave them a ton of benefit of the doubt, but still lukewarm response. Regulation on interchange worked in Europe. The other option is government mandated support for bank transfer rails. That’s how U…

Are you saying if MasterCard offered the merchant a 0.2% fee instead of the 2% fee, with all else equal, the merchant would actually prefer to keep the 2% fee?

To me the situation described sounds a lot like "I thought people cared about cheaper healthcare but when I offered them free clinic visits in Antartica nobody wanted to come. I guess they are just lying to themselves" - completely ignoring the reason for the rejection was the overlooked additional friction which actually raised total losses, not disinterest in lower cost itself. Offer a solution without the additional friction but with the improvement in the metric and I'm convinced you would find they are not lying to themselves about wanting to have more profit. Of course, the hard part here is creating such a solution would be extremely difficult (you'd have to onboard hundreds of millions of active users before you could pitch your solution to businesses, a bit of a paradox) - hence why MasterCard gets away with the rates and competition can not form (rather than confused merchants).

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#296
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don’t want to spend money you don’t have? Congrats, your credit score is trash and now you can’t rent a house (let alone buy).

Cut the BS please. I do not have to use CC when I do not have money and still have perfect credit score. Personally I do use my CC only when there is no other option and I pay it off immediately after making a purchase. My credit score is perfect and I've never spent using CC more than I have on my account.

[deleted]

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don’t want to spend money you don’t have? Congrats, your credit score is trash and now you can’t rent a house (let alone buy).

You can pretty trivially set credit cards to auto-pay and use them as debit cards, with the only difference being a delay in any overdraft penalty. Sure, if you overspend you get heavily penalized, and that's not great, but you don't have to spend a dime of interest to build a respectable credit score.

Again, you’re being forced into playing the Visa/MC game.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#298
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don’t want to spend money you don’t have? Congrats, your credit score is trash and now you can’t rent a house (let alone buy).

Cut the BS please. I do not have to use CC when I do not have money and still have perfect credit score. Personally I do use my CC only when there is no other option and I pay it off immediately after making a purchase. My credit score is perfect and I've never spent using CC more than I have on my account.

You’ve been playing the Visa/MC game for 20+ years to achieve a perfect score? You might then agree they have an overly large amount of influence in life?

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rewards exist because credit card transaction fees to merchants are very high, though. Europe put a limit on those fees and no credit card rewards exist here.

Sure, but for those of us in North America, it's still a draw. That said, I can see that the consumer would potentially be better off if fees went down, prices dropped, and rewards went away. But that's probably not a realistic future.

The unfortunate reality is that even if fees disappeared tomorrow, most merchants would just keep the current price and pocket all the extra money as profit.

Re: Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly (2024)

#300
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why not crypto? stablecoins could be a credible answer to this problem

Not with the new acts passed this last week. Only established players are in that space now (Also - this is going to get way worse now with fees devaluing the dollar that are now invisible to the average consumer).

are you arguing against regulation? with the new act, there is a clear definition of stablecoins and disclosure requirements that are better for consumers than the current "trust me bro" stablecoins like USDT
Post reply on HN