Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly, these look like baby’s first JavaScript projects. Surprising considering these doge employees are supposed to be genius coder whiz kids, and yet this looks like the work of someone following a tutorial to write their first tweet downloader.
Does being a 'genius coder whiz kid' imply knowledge of every technology? Should one only be allowed to publish code according to your standards? What kind of nonsense is this?
A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
291–300 of 404 posts
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#292Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
Implying that DOGE bozo is law-compliant while breaking laws and destroying trust is...humor too soon?
What laws are being broken?
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Implying that DOGE bozo is law-compliant while breaking laws and destroying trust is...humor too soon?
What functional, diplomatic purpose exists for calling him a "bozo"? What problems does this solve? Which tensions does this ease? Which conflicts does this stop? What sensitive government data does this un-leak? Which broken laws does this adjudicate? What usurped power is being brought back under control with this? Or is it just contributing to a one-way ratchet that only ever increases partisan polarization and ho…
On the other hand you have an internet user calling them a bozo.
De-escalating the conflict and lowering the temperature of discourse, as you suggest, massively favors the group trying to ram through these changes. If we take a deep breath and calmly work it out, it will already be over and nothing can be done.
Elected officials take notice of these urgent issues when there is significant public outcry. Now I'm not saying that one person calling them bozos meaningfully moves the needle, but as a principle if a regular person wants to do their best to stop what is happening, they must use strong language.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#295I wish people paid this close attention to federal workers and their agencies all the time.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's public info
Compilations of data can have value. That’s the whole point of the “facts aren’t copyrightable, but databases are” principle.
Am I on Reddit or HN?
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
> my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable They have shown over and over that they are after a good story, not good results. They’re going for shock factor and they’re pumping out propaganda at an alarming rate. We’ve seen so many hyperbolic claims of rampant fraud with zero evidence. At the same time, they’ve had to remove the bigges…
>Numerous other claims have been shown to account for entire contract amounts, even though they only cancelled the remaining balance of the contract. They are building this live and it's been a month as a side quest. They have fixed those issues that you have said, and have been updating the website, fixing different pricing, etc. etc. every single day. They have not been preparing for months... that's not how system…
There’s this idea, I have no idea from where, that entire world depends on the states, and without US everyone would literally starve to death. But it’s just really not the case. Sure, everyone would suffer, but any sane country has already worked out contingency plans, and is preparing for it while blatantly pretending to bend the knee.
I think there’s a deep cultural issue that you guys need to face and fix. In my opinion, most of it comes from the lack of education. However, you’re actively making sure that people are less educated and blur our the moral lines to have small wins that will be insignificant in the longer term.
I’m saying this as a person who has deep personal connections to people living in the states. Those people belong different “factions” of the political spectrum, and it is just incredibly sad to see from the sidelines.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
> my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable They have shown over and over that they are after a good story, not good results. They’re going for shock factor and they’re pumping out propaganda at an alarming rate. We’ve seen so many hyperbolic claims of rampant fraud with zero evidence. At the same time, they’ve had to remove the bigges…
>Numerous other claims have been shown to account for entire contract amounts, even though they only cancelled the remaining balance of the contract. They are building this live and it's been a month as a side quest. They have fixed those issues that you have said, and have been updating the website, fixing different pricing, etc. etc. every single day. They have not been preparing for months... that's not how system…
If the goal was reducing fraud and waste, accurate accounting would be a core principle and this wouldn't happen. They aren't because it's not. Their goal was rapid destruction of the US government apparatus to prevent oversight and accountability that would enable preservation and restoration of constitutional government. Seems like it's working.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
not really, unless your word processor outputs significant portions of text for you
Really not sure where this tangent is going but looking at hypothetical text it can be pretty obvious that various word processors were used. Like if an email has the same font/etc as google doc then it's pretty obvious they wrote it in a doc and then copy-paste it.
Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that there should be "why" comments. Those are great to have in any codebase. However, that does not preclude descriptive comments. Obviously, the best way to make code self-documenting is to wrap logic in a method whose name clearly describes its intended function. For one-liners however this can lead to overabstraction, and leaving a "what" comment can be entirely appropriate if the engineer decides it is.…
"Absolutisms are a sign of a bad engineer" Oh the tasty irony.
Please review the Hacker News guidelines, especially this excerpt:
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.