Live data from Hacker News

Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

bbc.co.uk

291–300 of 335 posts

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#291

So they’ve abandoned being the world’s best employer by forcing return to office and return to hub. Now they are publicly abandoning customer obsession by putting ads in the middle of a movie. Unless of course you pay them extra on top of a $100+ subscription fee that has already increased YoY. This is just the start of the Amazon extracting more and more from their customers. Enshitification of everything continues.

It's day 2 at Amazon.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#293

So they’ve abandoned being the world’s best employer by forcing return to office and return to hub. Now they are publicly abandoning customer obsession by putting ads in the middle of a movie. Unless of course you pay them extra on top of a $100+ subscription fee that has already increased YoY. This is just the start of the Amazon extracting more and more from their customers. Enshitification of everything continues.

It's day 2 at Amazon.

Well said. I agree 100%.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#294
post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

> I pay YouTube for no ads

Except you still do get ads. With every single major YouTube video dropping a "now to talk about our sponsor" segment.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Similarly high end consumer brands like Gucci don't blast their labels on their high end products. The cheap stuff is cheap because you become a walking billboard. The expensive stuff is expensive because you just paid for quality. That's even within one company so your point is even more extreme across an industry.

Dior and Louis Vuitton love putting their logos all over their products, especially accessories. I think it cheapens the brand, but i'm not their marketing person.

Even with those if you sort their products by price the higher cost ones have a subtler logo because you're right, it does cheapen the product. The higher cost/higher end from these brands are basically a separate company with a shared name.

The lower cost ones have the logo because that's how the people you're around will know. The higher cost ones don't have the logo because the people around you will recognize quality.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#298
post #292

I guess paying for Netflix is not so bad if it stays ad free.

I thought that Netflix and other services had permanently put me off watching movies with ads. For some reason, I started watching Tubi TV which has ads. If I turned off the audio during the commerical break, I found it was a reasonable experience. I'm now doing the same when I watch sports with ads. So I'm guessing I won't pay extra to disable Prime Video ads.

Likewise with podcasts, I press the jump forward button to skip ads. It's satisfactory if not perfect.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#299
post #286
post #282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They raised the price of Prime $36/year, but you can opt out by having ads in video.

Not exactly. It’s $2.99 per month. So pay that when there is something good to watch on Prime Video, then remove it. Though I’m hoping that will work, will see when if actually happens.

Why would it not work? I've done the same with other streaming services.

Re: Amazon Prime Video content to start including ads next year

#300
post #294
post #48

I flat out do not watch ads. If a platform has ads, I do not watch it full stop. I pay YouTube for no ads. If I lost that option, I would not watch YouTube. Same with all of the other streaming services. Netflix pushed it last year with preview rolls. It was barely acceptable/tolerable. But I will eagerly jettison any service that makes me pay for ads. Heck, I even look askance at people who willingly pay money to un…

> I pay YouTube for no ads Except you still do get ads. With every single major YouTube video dropping a "now to talk about our sponsor" segment.

True, but these are almost always very easily skippable.
Post reply on HN