Live data from Hacker News

Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

newsroom.toyota.eu

291–300 of 327 posts

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#292

If a Model 3 LR is 75kwh, and this is roughly 3x the range, and that takes roughly 20 minutes to go 10-80% at a supercharger then can anyone tell me what kind of hardware would be required to charge a 225kwh battery in the same time? Is it remotely feasible to build at least 100,000 of those chargers all over the world? Sounds like each one would need a gigantic capacitor or flywheel on site.

Those chargers already exist. Tesla vehicles are limited by their 400v electrical system. Porsche already charges faster for longer via an 800v electrical system.

You also have to remember even 10-80 throttles SIGNIFICANTLY over that window as the battery fills. The higher speeds will run for longer on a larger battery assuming it is designed with sufficient cooling - one of the features of solid state batteries is supposed to be the ability to charge at higher rates for longer duration.

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#293
post #285

…why? I get range anxiety is a thing. But no one needs that kind of range in a car. Why not make it 400mi/650km and save a ton of weight? The battery here gives double the range of an Accord. Who needs that? Less battery is less weight. That’s better for tires, roads, charge times, brakes, accidents, acceleration, drivability, cost, and probably more. 250mi is plenty. For most even less. But there’s a psychological f…

[deleted]

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#296

932 miles is suspiciously specific.

only in imperial does it look suspicious.

If they understood significant figures, it would be less suspicious. Besides, when a vendor uses their own special metric, instead of a well known standard, I lose respect for them.

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#297
post #284
post #272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How often are you driving 1800 miles in a day.

Truly autonomous cars could drive you cross country while you work, eat, sleep and consume entertainment all within the car. With those kinds of efficiencies it's pretty attractive regardless, but very short charging breaks would be even more attractive.

Replacing bus drivers with computers won't make them any more attractive as workspaces. There's a reason musicians don't actually like touring.

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#298
post #285

…why? I get range anxiety is a thing. But no one needs that kind of range in a car. Why not make it 400mi/650km and save a ton of weight? The battery here gives double the range of an Accord. Who needs that? Less battery is less weight. That’s better for tires, roads, charge times, brakes, accidents, acceleration, drivability, cost, and probably more. 250mi is plenty. For most even less. But there’s a psychological f…

Large Vehicles?

Freight Carries?

Locomotives with battery cars for energy recovery (braking, downhill, etc)

Re: Toyota’s advanced battery technology roadmap

#299
post #284
post #272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How often are you driving 1800 miles in a day.

Truly autonomous cars could drive you cross country while you work, eat, sleep and consume entertainment all within the car. With those kinds of efficiencies it's pretty attractive regardless, but very short charging breaks would be even more attractive.

Sounds great. Sort of like a train, except with more traffic, no bathroom, more sudden acceleration and motion sickness, and no space to stand up and walk around.
Post reply on HN