Earlier quoted context omitted.
Try it. Adopt it. :) Just a few weeks ago, facial recognition was added and that was it for me. I finally made the switch from Google Photos and iCloud to immich. It's your self-hosted google photos alternative, with image recognition, a map, sharing folders publicly, or with other users on your server. Some parts will be buggy though, like face detection, or memories. But the whole "backup & sync" part is very relia…
I’m working on building something similar. From what I can tell, Immich, Ente, and PhotoPrism are the best of the batch when it comes to open source photo storage and management. They are all good, but it depends on what you’re looking for. Personally, I want: E2E encryption, on-device face recognition, and the ability to self-host as well as a paid option for people who don’t want to manage their own server. The exi…
Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
291–300 of 354 posts
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#292What I'm still desperately looking for is proper self-hosted full-phone backups for Android phones.
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#293Trying to get off dropbox. 1) Anyone try Backblaze for photo backups? Is it worth trying? 2) Why is immich photo and video only? 3) Why docker? I miss the days of just files and scripts on any host.
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found that SyncThing is not a great solution for the "mobile photo reel" use case. I want my entire photo collection to be easily searchable & accessible from my mobile device, but I don't need a complete copy of my photo reel to be saved to my device. I want to be able to delete things from my phone to free up space, but I want them to still exist in my photo collection that is backed up to the cloud.
> but I don't need a complete copy of my photo reel to be saved to my device this resonates with me. what solution are you using?
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#295I'm using Synology Photos, have no complaints. Its really a good starter when decoupling from google photos, removing all subscription and taking control of my own data with expandable raid storage
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found that SyncThing is not a great solution for the "mobile photo reel" use case. I want my entire photo collection to be easily searchable & accessible from my mobile device, but I don't need a complete copy of my photo reel to be saved to my device. I want to be able to delete things from my phone to free up space, but I want them to still exist in my photo collection that is backed up to the cloud.
> but I don't need a complete copy of my photo reel to be saved to my device this resonates with me. what solution are you using?
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m working on building something similar. From what I can tell, Immich, Ente, and PhotoPrism are the best of the batch when it comes to open source photo storage and management. They are all good, but it depends on what you’re looking for. Personally, I want: E2E encryption, on-device face recognition, and the ability to self-host as well as a paid option for people who don’t want to manage their own server. The exi…
If you are willing to consider closed source, paid options there is also Mylio
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#298Trying to break down the rough cost to do this via a SaaS, someone correct me if I'm wrong here: - 4 cores/6GB RAM is $40/mo on DigitalOcean, and that's with only 160GB storage. Lowest AWS S3 tier is $0.023/GB, so assuming 1-2TB of photos that's $30-40 for additional storage. - The non-named company's 2TB subscription is $100/mo, translating to savings of only ~$20. - Building a server would be probably ~$250, electr…
There is no sane person on earth doing this kind of thing to save money. That's entirely missing the point
I can buy a 4TB HDD for ~$80. Assuming I need more storage, this saves money.
Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
>If you are taking a couple of pictures a day, you only need to run this service for a couple of minutes per day, the rest is wasted. You can configure your server to sleep (scheduled or use WoL), which will halve (or more) that carbon emission number. Speaking of which, individual action will never approach the level that corporate action could. Take a look at the practice of gas flaring (2022 estimate of ~357 milli…
Turning a service on/off makes a lot of sense for this kind of application. I sincerely didn't post my comment to shame anymore. Need for computing is growing fast and it is actually not negligible at all. See the link below, data centers emitted 300 MTCo2 in 2020, similar to the number you mentioned. https://www.iea.org/reports/data-centres-and-data-transmissi...
Wow, I didn't realize there were so many datacenters. My comment about corporate action still stands though - there's no reason why companies running those data centers cannot switch to renewable sources for even a portion of their usage.
I'm no fanboy but I was impressed to see how Apple's office is 100% powered by solar (75% through rooftop, rest through an offsite farm) :
https://www.solar.com/learn/apples-new-campus-country-larges...
According to Renewable Energy World, the campus will run entirely on renewable energy. It will generate 17 megawatts (MW) of solar on rooftops and also be supplemented by 4 megawatts of Bloom Energy fuel cells. They’re hoping that this onsite generation will cover around 75% of power requirements during working hours. The remaining energy needed will be supplied by a 130-megawatt off-site solar farm in Monterey County.Re: Self-hosted photo and video backups directly from your mobile phone
#300Trying to break down the rough cost to do this via a SaaS, someone correct me if I'm wrong here: - 4 cores/6GB RAM is $40/mo on DigitalOcean, and that's with only 160GB storage. Lowest AWS S3 tier is $0.023/GB, so assuming 1-2TB of photos that's $30-40 for additional storage. - The non-named company's 2TB subscription is $100/mo, translating to savings of only ~$20. - Building a server would be probably ~$250, electr…
You're correct, but consider these kind of solutions to be more of a hobbyist-inclined. Be prepared to continue investing into maintenance occasionally (and somewhat erratically, because Immich does bring in breaking changes). Another thing to keep in mind is that - the server you get for $250 would also allow you to deploy many other apps (I have a similar spec, and deploy ~20 apps). So, net-net if the setup brings…