291–300 of 519 posts
Awesome, I’ve put stable diffusion on an api to train a model for anyone to use for free. I’m adding 2.0 to it as we speak! https://88stacks.com
Ideally one that states that the uploaded images are deleted after generating the model and not used for anything else in any fashion whatsoever.
Also,let people download the models and delete them afterwards with the same handling. Then it gets very interesting indeed!
Is there a good explanation of how to train this from scratch with a custom dataset[0]? I've been looking around the documentation on Huggingface, but all I could find was either how to train unconditional U-Nets[1], or how to use the pretrained Stable Diffusion model to process image prompts (which I already know how to do). Writing a training loop for CLIP manually wound up with me banging against all sorts of stra…
> Specifically, Wikimedia Commons images in the PD-Art-100 category, because the images will be public domain in the US and the labels CC-BY-SA. Doesn't the "BY" part of the license mean you have to provide attribution along with your models' output[0]? I feel you'll have the equivalent of Github Copilot problem: it might be prohibitive to correctly attribute each output, and listing the entire dataset in attribution…
One thing I’m wondering is what kind of different applications it can be used. Maybe there will be new experiences in the fashion industry like people can train their cloth designs and see how it looks on people. Maybe they don’t need to hire models to do the modelling?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah I am glad to see someone else talking about using public domain images! Honestly it baffles me that in all this discussion, I rarely see people discussing how to do this with appropriately licensed images. There are some pretty large datasets out there of public images, and doing so might even help encourage more people to contribute to open datasets. Also if the big ML companies HAD to use open images, they would…
The problem is not that people aren't owning ideas hard enough, ideas shouldn't be ownable in this way, the problem is that we've created a system that's obsessed with scarcity and collecting rents. Being able to own and trade ideas a la copyright/patents helps people who can buy copyrights and patents stifle creativity more than it helps artists gather reward for their creation (though it does both). Human endeavor…
Then came the brutal reality: creating high-quality artwork needs time. Some can be created after work, but not that much. Some forms of art require expensive instruments. Some, like filmmaking, require collaboration and coordination of many people. So yes, I could do some forms of art part-time using the money from my day job, but I knew it was a far cry from what I could do when working on it full time. It's not capitalism, it's just reality.
GitHub Repo: https://github.com/Stability-AI/stablediffusion HuggingFace Space (currently overloaded unsurprisingly): https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion Doing a 2.0 release on a (US) 2-day holiday weekend is an interesting move. It seems a tad more difficult to set up the model than the previous version.
One thing I’m wondering is what kind of different applications it can be used. Maybe there will be new experiences in the fashion industry like people can train their cloth designs and see how it looks on people. Maybe they don’t need to hire models to do the modelling?
I've also built a similar service[1] that does this with inpainting instead of textual inversion, so it preserves the face exactly and returns in seconds, not hours. [1] - https://app.gooey.ai/FaceInpainting/
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've also built a similar service[1] that does this with inpainting instead of textual inversion, so it preserves the face exactly and returns in seconds, not hours. [1] - https://app.gooey.ai/FaceInpainting/
doesn't show any controls after the loading banner in my Firefox
Earlier quoted context omitted.
LMFAO What do you propose? The FBI releases a CSAM data set for devs to use for “training”? Would you be the one to create the model? Would you run a business that sells synthetic CSAM?
Yes to the first and no to the second seem the obvious answers here.