Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kagi accepts debit cards.
It depends on the kind of debit card apparently. What I have is a girocard[1], which doesn't have the required 16 digit card number and CVC. I didn't even know that debit cards can have those. My online payments are usually made via SEPA bank transfers, Giropay[2] or Paypal. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girocard [2] https://stripe.com/docs/payments/giropay
uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
291–300 of 339 posts
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#292Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#293I've posted this before, but you can achieve the same with uBlock Origin static filters alone without having to install any additional extensions. For example: To block results from specific domains on Google or DDG: google.*##.g:has(a[href*="thetopsites.com"]) duckduckgo.*##.results > div:has(a[href*="thetopsites.com"]) And it's even possible to target an element's text content with a `:has-text(/regex/)` selector:…
Is there a way to get rid of results with listicle titles like "8 Best Toasters to Buy in 2022"?
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#294Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#295Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
I still think Adblock Plus has superior UI than uBlock Origin, despite hasn't been using it for years.
uBlock is a great blocker, but an absolutely garbage UI. Luckily the on/off button + 'Element Blocker' context menu entry do most of what I want without having to yet again try to decipher its cryptic icons.
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh, $10 a month is pretty steep. It's great that they offer a free plan, but that comes with all the misaligned incentives again. Any reason they don't just do pay-per-use (1 cent per query)?
From their usage panel, I do 50-200 research per day. In 10 days my usage cost is estimated at 11.69$. It look like each query cost 1.25$ to Kagi. I don't want to be conscientious of the cost of my search usage, I fear it will inconsciously reduce my search usage and access to knowledge.
Nevermind. Looks like you have to have a subscription to see usage stats.
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
uBlock is a great blocker, but an absolutely garbage UI. Luckily the on/off button + 'Element Blocker' context menu entry do most of what I want without having to yet again try to decipher its cryptic icons.
I like ublock origin's UI. Its one of the best extension UI's Ive used. Simple and clear. It's bare bones for power users and I guess that makes it inaccessible, calling it garbage seems like overkill.
A good UI should be self-explanatory, this is not even close.
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having a button to remove the offending site right from the search results saves quite a bit of time, so while i usually prefer not to have extra extensions, i see a lot of utility here.
Same reason why I still use uMatrix in addition to uBlock even though custom rules in the latter are not any less powerful - user interface matters.
Re: uBlacklist – Block specific sites from appearing in Google search results
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh, $10 a month is pretty steep. It's great that they offer a free plan, but that comes with all the misaligned incentives again. Any reason they don't just do pay-per-use (1 cent per query)?
Pay per use is a great model for search and I wish we could use it. But I don”t think the world is ready yet. In our survey 90% of users told us they preffered fixed fee over pay per use and feedback we got was that pay per use would make them anxious to use search. Also it adds additional friction in the signup flow (where the idea of paid search is already a novelty and then pay per search?) and so we decided to go…
I would bet that my usage most months would not exceed $5, and I think many other prospective users would be willing to gamble on that as well. Food for thought.