Live data from Hacker News

Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

mattstoller.substack.com

291–300 of 595 posts

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#291
post #272

Big pharma is significantly less of a problem than the physician and hospital cartels. I have no idea why these groups have survived scrutiny for their literal multi-hundred million dollar lobbying/bribery of politicians. My closest guess is that we all know "My" physician or a well paid nurse that benefits from the bribery.

Are you kidding? https://www.rand.org/news/press/2021/01/28.html > Prescription Drug Prices in the United States Are 2.56 Times Those in Other Countries

So are the nannies and the landscapers. Are these also a racket?

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#292

Big pharma is significantly less of a problem than the physician and hospital cartels. I have no idea why these groups have survived scrutiny for their literal multi-hundred million dollar lobbying/bribery of politicians. My closest guess is that we all know "My" physician or a well paid nurse that benefits from the bribery.

Sutter Health is one of those hospital cartels. They've made it so that giving birth in Sacramento is now one of the most expensive cities in America. It's all a racket.

Source: https://www.kqed.org/stateofhealth/205822/northern-californi...

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#293

"Big Pharma" in the eyes of the public is two related but separate issues; 1) the weird employment-insurance-hospital loop that has developed in the US, and the terrible second-order-consequences of all the open-high/settle-low insurer carer system it led to, and 2) the medicine advertisements, and all the terrible consequences thereof. The second one seems like a much easier thing to get rid of using hard government…

There is also a third issue:

The high cost of medicines that are low cost to produce, and are sold at low cost elsewhere

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is that legal?

… kind of. There are certain personal use exceptions, but definitely something you want to speak with a lawyer about.

Don't need to speak to a lawyer. Millions of folks do this every year to save money. Doesn't mean they'll have unique drugs in stock however.

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#295

Is he really in a position to keep doing this? Biden recorder the most votes in history, while winning the fewest counties. That's a head scratcher. The fact remains most of the geographic area of the country voted red. If he keeps this up, states are going to start ignoring his executive orders. That's not how democracy is supposed to work. Laws get passed by legislature, not by dictate of the King.

> Biden recorder the most votes in history, while winning the fewest counties. That's a head scratcher.

Why is that a head scratcher? 40% the us population lives in just 100 counties (of 3000)

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#296
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My contact lens prescription is similar.

Contact lens prescriptions change though, and bad contacts can do subtle damage to the wearer’s eye. I have permanent scarring in my eyes because I over-wore my 2 week contacts, my fault I know, but without an eye doctor appointment I would have done even more damage.

I’ve had the same script for 20 years.

I should add that the same thing applies to glasses.

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s the entire model It is part of large complicated model. If it was their entire model they wouldn't be operating medical offices and hospitals. It is the whole package that helps them control costs.

It is my understanding that obligatory routine care is a major component of Kaiser’s model. In the experience of those I know who use Kaiser, effectively, if they come in for something and their routine checkups are out of date, they’re obligated to get that routine checkup (at the same time due to streamline of service), before they can get what they came in for. From this, I derived the argument that routine checku…

I've been on a Kaiser plan for years. I don't think I've ever had a "routine checkup", but have had other services.

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#298
post #291
post #272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you kidding? https://www.rand.org/news/press/2021/01/28.html > Prescription Drug Prices in the United States Are 2.56 Times Those in Other Countries

So are the nannies and the landscapers. Are these also a racket?

Services from nannies and landscapers are nontradeable goods. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradability

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#299
post #63

Big pharma is significantly less of a problem than the physician and hospital cartels. I have no idea why these groups have survived scrutiny for their literal multi-hundred million dollar lobbying/bribery of politicians. My closest guess is that we all know "My" physician or a well paid nurse that benefits from the bribery.

I don't see most physicians being an issue. Many of them are fed up with the insurance, pharma, and regulations. Most are forced to work for large providers instead of being independent just due to the overhead of dealing with digital record systems, legal, insurance billing, etc.

I've heard they're fed up w/ insurance, billing...but the few times I've asked "hey what if I pay cash, not through insurance, is it cheaper?" (I knew I wont meet deductible...)

It was actually more expensive. I've stopped asking and feel it's a urban myth.

Re: Biden launches action on "Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Ag" – can it be real?

#300
post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I'm having issues I'll call the doctor. I don't need a babysitter.

Some people do though. Imagine someone who just lets this stuff lapse and they are still being regularly prescribed stuff that should have been cancelled 8 years ago.

People already die quietly alone all the time. How far do we need to go to have everyone have a babysitter, especially at their own expense?
Post reply on HN