Earlier quoted context omitted.
Big +1. I would be really interested to find one, only ONE, website where React/Angular was really bringing a better experience and better final product than a standard pure JS with simple Ajax system.
Come on man, real programmers use assembly and roll their own browsers.
Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
291–300 of 489 posts
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#292I'm actually really surprised by the number of comments in this thread about how the new redesign is slower. I've had it since yesterday and it genuinely feels much faster and more responsive than the old Facebook UI - though, to be fair, that's not a huge accomplishment give that the old UI would take forever to finish painting or respond to input. I'd consider it a success, especially when compared to the disaster…
Let’s go on this tangent, why is Reddit’s frontend so sluggish and lacking quality of life improvements that should be in place by now? Surely they are hiring world-class devs, so what’s holding them back?
Facebook Engineering has a notorious "not invented by me" culture, it's not unique there but a lot of our "world-class" engineers are just acting economically rationally and hole-digging on some new bespoke framework or tool to cement their position in the company. You end up with a massive amount of churn and over-engineered vanity projects, and it's manifesting downstream in basically every product we've turned out for the last five years. That's why the applications bloated and terrible.
The joke inside the company is that it used to be "move fast and break things" but now it's "breakfast, vest and move things around". It's really an engineering culture of decadence and waste these days.
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#293I'm actually really surprised by the number of comments in this thread about how the new redesign is slower. I've had it since yesterday and it genuinely feels much faster and more responsive than the old Facebook UI - though, to be fair, that's not a huge accomplishment give that the old UI would take forever to finish painting or respond to input. I'd consider it a success, especially when compared to the disaster…
The neverending quest to reduce information density is a usability disaster, despite the misheld belief that cleanliness = usable. Zooming out on the new fb interface, to restore some information density, leaves a comical amount of whitespace. Wells Fargo has turned its desktop interface into a giant stretched mobile app. Nothing is hyperlinks that support right click or new tab anymore.
https://medium.com/signal-v-noise/why-i-love-ugly-messy-inte...
The cluster f of the old old facebook interface was beautiful.
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#294Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think React/Angular are products to increase user experience? Of course you won't find that, they are tools for developers to streamline development and make maintenance easier. Have you worked on a platform that uses nothing but pure JS and fetch calls? I have, and there's no way to make sense of a project that has to deal with so many things.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F5hA79vKE_E
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Facebook rendered just fine a decade ago. What changed between now and then It does way more things. In particular, there are a lot more interactive experiences. A decade ago, it just loaded a web page and nothing changed until you refreshed. Now live videos and other content types have streams of comments and reactions pushed to the client in real time.
I really don't want a video to autoplay on the side of the screen when I'm reading some news article, for example. It was so much better before when there just were less ways of doing what the website wanted and more ways of doing what you wanted with your browser and your computing power.
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#297I'm actually really surprised by the number of comments in this thread about how the new redesign is slower. I've had it since yesterday and it genuinely feels much faster and more responsive than the old Facebook UI - though, to be fair, that's not a huge accomplishment give that the old UI would take forever to finish painting or respond to input. I'd consider it a success, especially when compared to the disaster…
Try it with a normal computer for normal people, not with your monstrous 'developer machine'.
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F5hA79vKE_E
why is it downvote ? This link just show you can create a basic twitter like application in 10 minutes with the right tool. Imagine how many hours/days it would take with any JavaScript framework !
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#299Quite sincerely, it's a total failure. I got the chance to try the new interface, and it's so slow that it's barely usable. It's even slower than the old website, that was already painfully slow. Loading a random profile takes 8 seconds. Opening a messenger discussion takes 6 seconds. It reminds me of the new Reddit website. Facebook was more enjoyable to use 12 years ago. It's really sad that in 2020, 10k+ engineers…
I use mbasic.facebook.com as much as possible. Occasionally I'll use m.facebook.com. I've had the mobile apps uninstalled for ages.
Re: Rebuilding our tech stack for the new facebook.com
#300The most irritating "feature" of Facebook is they insert themselves like eight deep in the history when opening their page so the back button doesn't work.