Live data from Hacker News

ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

techcrunch.com

291–300 of 326 posts

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Flicker?? Are you talking about CRT monitors still?

LCDs still flicker

There are a lot of LCDs that don't flicker, or ones that flicker at 40khz or other high frequencies which is imperceptibile to a human. There are databases on the internet if you want to get a flicker-free LCD screen or laptop.

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#292

One thing that's rarely mentioned about this device, but is the reason I sprung for it, is that the developers left an SSH interface into the device over USB, so you can program custom apps! People have made some neat stuff, and there's a Rust library for making apps: https://github.com/reHackable/awesome-reMarkable

There are e-ink tablets that are basically just Android, supporting Android apps. Does remarkable have any advantage over those? I mean having a custom OS (even though with SSH) compared to the vast ecosystem of android apps and dev resources surely sounnds like a huge drawback.

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was a fairly early pre-order for RM1, early enough that I had forgotten about it in the 6 months or so it took after pre-order for me to get it. But as soon as I get the email for RM2 I pre-ordered again. To your point, it is the product the digital paper market has been waiting for. I am an avid hand-writer. I have been a Levenger Circa user for more than 20 years, and basically had a subscription to the Circa pap…

Your comment on the device being dev friendly and the fact that you wrote your own utilities is really making me consider to preorder RM2. I saw all these comments and wish I can somehow integrate my own workflow into it.

Apparently the CTO is a KDE dev, so it's properly open. Has definitely made me very interested in one too.

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#295

It hurts my heart how conflicted I am about this device. The hardware _is_ there. I love using the original reMarkable tablet _when it works_. But damn there are some stupid software decisions, alongside some absolutely genius ones. (Disclaimer: I've had the original reMarkable tablet for 3 months now) Here's a summary of my experience with it: - It's sometimes unstable, and crashes while I draw. Not super often but…

The companion app is written in Qt, it's the same app whether you use it on Windows, Linux, Android or iOS. Because of that the interface can be a bit whacky, but it works fine.

Heck, even the interface on the remarkable itself is written using Qt!

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#296

What is the main reason that make these devices so expensive? Is it low demand? complex technology? or something to do with patents?

Niche market, there are barely any competitors. I believe Sony has a competing device for business, costs around 1k$

Onyx also has one, it's a bit cheaper than the remarkable.

All of these devices have major flaws and upsides.

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was a fairly early pre-order for RM1, early enough that I had forgotten about it in the 6 months or so it took after pre-order for me to get it. But as soon as I get the email for RM2 I pre-ordered again. To your point, it is the product the digital paper market has been waiting for. I am an avid hand-writer. I have been a Levenger Circa user for more than 20 years, and basically had a subscription to the Circa pap…

Your comment on the device being dev friendly and the fact that you wrote your own utilities is really making me consider to preorder RM2. I saw all these comments and wish I can somehow integrate my own workflow into it.

Yeah, regarding workflow, I commented elsewhere but despite being a preorder of the RM1, I failed to establish a good "rapport" with the device when I first got it (late in 2018), and basically set it aside for a year until suddenly late last year, struggling with my paper workflow, a switch was flipped and I saw how I could adopt it, and I did, and now I love it.

The software had improved dramatically- they seem to be doing a good to exceptional job at getting incremental features out on a regular tempo without breakage, no simple task- but I think a certain amount of "hammock-time" plus increased awareness of non-digital pain points was necessary for a new perspective to flip into place. (This is re: seemingly small things like using distinct per day notebooks and per week folders, rather than a single monolithic notebook with paper-like day headings etc)

And my workflow is still limited- I am not using the writing recognition at all as yet- and there are plenty of use cases I come up constantly that it doesn't address- smart task lists, various kinds of copy paste, maps (!!!). If one has any kind of paper-based or digital habits adopting the device will be a challenge and involve frustration until it clicks, and probably even after.

But I have confidence both in the device's trajectory and moreover in the ergonomics of a community developer's engagement with the org. There is a lot of open space for patient, flexible developers to build cool stuff in. Cheers.

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#298
post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Beetlejuice didn't so much show up and take advice as he showed up and tried stage a shotgun wedding with your underage daughter in order to exploit some sort of interdimensional green card loophole. This is suddenly very reminiscent of John Mulaney describing Back to the Future...

The whole "say someone's name 3 times in a mirror" predates Beetlejuice by a long stretch. That said, I don't know of any of the those myths that ended in happy endings for those saying the name, so I think your main point still stands. ;)

Unless your name is Randall Munroe :)

https://xkcd.com/555/

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#299

I really love the ReMarkable and this was an easy preorder. The only thing I personally disliked was 1. No eraser on the pen and 2. No USB-C support. Both are resolved here

You only get an eraser if you pay an extra $50 for the Marker Plus, which is crazy to me.

Yeah the prices are a little ridiculous but I can’t really complain considering how niche of a product this is and how amazing the reMarkable 1 is

Re: ReMarkable’s redesigned e-paper tablet is more powerful and more papery

#300

Terrible link, the actual reMarkable website is much better. It's a very niche device but I've owned mine for nearly two years and am a big advocate. In some ways, the first model was proof of concept. Excellent hardware and writing experience, but the early versions of the software were horrible, and the device itself is very ugly. The software has improved dramatically in the time I've owned it, going from horrible…

No more paper notebooks? YES GIVE ME! Top of my wishlist.

Does it support ePub format ebooks or just PDFs?

Post reply on HN