Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

WireGuard is now in Linus' tree

lists.zx2c4.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

291–293 of 293 posts

Re: WireGuard is now in Linus' tree

#291

Post by whatsdoom »

adevx wrote: post #289
whatsdoom wrote: post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you follow a particular tutorial or do you have any resources you'd recommend to help replicate this setup? I've been interested in setting up a private network similar to what you describe and your comment has piqued my interest in finally building it

I'm considering writing a blog post about it as I documented most steps. Plus having everything in Ansible is more or less a guide / tutorial in itself.

Oh awesome, well if you need someone to test out a draft of the post let me know. I'd be glad to help

Re: WireGuard is now in Linus' tree

#292

Post by yencabulator »

oarsinsync wrote: post #124
yash1th wrote: post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just learned about tailscale today on twitter. Here's the tweet from the founder https://twitter.com/davidcrawshaw/status/1222203472461926401... Looks really promising

It does look very nice. It's a shame that it depends on third parties for authentication, and that they have gems like this in their documentation: > No app-level integration or reconfiguration is required, because security is built into the network itself. If you configure your network to require Tailscale, every one of your internal services will be subject to multi-factor authentication. Which is simply not true.…

The idea of a vulnerability in any app I run having access to all my things is quite scary. Status quo is that they at least have to reach the file storing browser cookies before they "become me"; the way Tailscale is talking about their system sounds like fewer barriers.
Post reply on HN