Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt any self-hosted service is going to be more reliable than gmail.
Going on 11 years here with no real issues.
Gmail.com was down
281–290 of 322 posts
Re: Gmail.com was down
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
it does. When I want it to, not when I don't want it to.
So you have redundant internet connections, back-up power generators, a high availability cluster, etc? That seems like a lot of money just to host your own mail server.
Re: Gmail.com was down
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chromium crash on Arch Linux with this message: http://pastebin.com/f9JMsPzT terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): bitset::set [1] 4934 abort (core dumped) chromium singing out of sync for now.. Edit: no crashes since I signed out of sync Edit2: found a more complete stack trace by somebody else: https://gist.github.com/4251938 Bug Report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/…
Yes Chromium without sync works fine for me too. edit: Gmail works fine for me in Denmark, maybe it is only a regional outage?
Re: Gmail.com was down
#284Re: Gmail.com was down
#285Re: Gmail.com was down
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
As soon as Yahoo shows me my inbox instead of an ad when I sign in, I'd consider going back. Until then, all the wasted time clicking away from the ad cancels any extra uptime. Luckily I've heard Marissa is actually pushing for this change :)
Well, outlook.com / live.com email is pretty nice nowadays. I'm tempted to forward my personal gmail stuff there for a while to see how it holds up.
http://fastmail.fm
/biasRe: Gmail.com was down
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow. One web service goes down and you can't even use your browser. Maybe this is a sign that they're too tightly integrated.
No. Since this is only happening to those that explicitly enable syncing with the web this is just a bug.
Re: Gmail.com was down
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly the bug links to 163267, which is marked private (i.e. a security issue). I've had more downtime out of Google in the past few years than I ever did out of my Yahoo mailbox.
As soon as Yahoo shows me my inbox instead of an ad when I sign in, I'd consider going back. Until then, all the wasted time clicking away from the ad cancels any extra uptime. Luckily I've heard Marissa is actually pushing for this change :)
Re: Gmail.com was down
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interestingly the bug links to 163267, which is marked private (i.e. a security issue). I've had more downtime out of Google in the past few years than I ever did out of my Yahoo mailbox.
As soon as Yahoo shows me my inbox instead of an ad when I sign in, I'd consider going back. Until then, all the wasted time clicking away from the ad cancels any extra uptime. Luckily I've heard Marissa is actually pushing for this change :)
While you are on that page, enable SSL by default: Turn on SSL: Check "Make your Yahoo! Mail more secure with SSL"
Re: Gmail.com was down
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
Chromium crash on Arch Linux with this message: http://pastebin.com/f9JMsPzT terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range' what(): bitset::set [1] 4934 abort (core dumped) chromium singing out of sync for now.. Edit: no crashes since I signed out of sync Edit2: found a more complete stack trace by somebody else: https://gist.github.com/4251938 Bug Report: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/…
Yes Chromium without sync works fine for me too. edit: Gmail works fine for me in Denmark, maybe it is only a regional outage?