Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll give you one thing: you're bold to try to spin a comment like this. There's not a sentence here that isn't a falsehood or working in service of one. Ghandi was not poor. He was a trained lawyer with experience working abroad who adopted some practices in solidarity with people who were actually suffering in poverty. Just because he wasn't a millionaire doesn't mean that he hadn't accrued significant social capit…
Consider human history. You will be able to see that the greatest acts of good and evil were not done by the ultra rich.
Making a statement like this puts every other in which you appeal to objectivity in question. Where it's not so broad that it says nothing, it's trivially falsifiable. I read it as a passive-aggressive concession from someone who knows that they're wrong but can't admit it.