Live data from Hacker News

PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

github.com

281–290 of 376 posts

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#281
post #218

Been running my instance for more than 5 years now, feel free to ask questions.

How much does it cost you? what is your business model to substain it?

I didn't estimate the cost but server-wise it's less than 30 EUR/month. What's demanding is transcoding but with the new architecture https://docs.joinpeertube.org/contribute/architecture#remote... there are ways to optimize, e.g. do nightly batch transcoding on a cheaper spot instances.

My business model is showcase and archival of my prototyping work. I'm the only account on my instance so there is no surprise with suddenly someone abusing the instance.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because people are expected to spend their time, effort and money to provide content for you for free, of course. Seems like the only explanation.

They're not. No one asked OP to use peertube. This is software for people who want to share videos. Coming in and declaring you won't use it because you can't make money from your videos should just get an "okay?" Interjecting into a FOSS space and complaining they are not paying you is beyond bizarre. Doubling down when people basically say "actually I'm specifically looking for non-commercial groups, so your absenc…

> As a video watcher, the main issue I have with YouTube is the presence of monetization.

I was replying to that. This commenter is not a hobbyist making video, he watches some hobbyists video, and them getting paid is the issue he has.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With adblocker enabled: error loading dynamically imported module: https://exquisite.tube/client/standalone/videos/assets/peert...

Toggling ubo allowed the videos the load

Thanks for reporting it! I'll have a look

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#284
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe the purpose of Youtube going forward is to be a quarantine for content whose purpose is to be monetized.

If YouTube becomes a quarantine for high-quality content, then it will also become a quarantine for viewers. the fundamental issue a lot of people here don't seem to get is that high quality videos that people want to watch are expensive to create. Besides the huge amount of high-skill labor, there's also just production costs, software, equipment, upkeep, etc. At the very least, ignoring all other costs, a single pe…

I believe most people here "get" that.

They have a problem with high quality production (more engaging due to production), low value content that proliferates on platforms like YouTube, and would rather see more high value content regardless of production quality, and Internet, in general enabled that if not for people starting to think about (ad supported) revenue first.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#286
post #41

As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. I think people who don't make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want to watch. This isn't like writing a tweet or even posting a picture on Instagram. Even a decent 20-minute video can easily take 40 man-hours of high-skilled labor. I have a pretty small…

>I think people who don't make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want to watch.

This is something I always thought to be extremely funny. Producing videos is a hobby. If you made it your job, go figure out how to monetize your material yourself. Nobody prevents you from taking sponsorships.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#287
post #41

As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. I think people who don't make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want to watch. This isn't like writing a tweet or even posting a picture on Instagram. Even a decent 20-minute video can easily take 40 man-hours of high-skilled labor. I have a pretty small…

It would still be a great alternative for the original YouTube. The one with video replies and all that, that was basically just people video blogging at each other or into the ether.

> And yes, there are people who make content for free - most of them fail to hit a hundred views per video.

Where is the "fail" though? Some of those videos take exactly as long to make is it does to watch them. If they don't get monetized (maybe for speaking normal English instead of saying "unalive" and "to grape"), then someone else doesn't make a lot of money from even the little effort it took them by showing ads [0] to people. If all you want to do is talk at a camera and maybe with some people, then all that is a plus.

[0] Speaking of ads, some of the stuff on youtube is wild. Like, honestly gross and disturbing to me.

If you are looking to make money of it, sure, starting with peertube only would be nonsense. If you just wanna make videos, do it! Upload the best ones to youtube and mention peertube, so you maybe get some audience. Then if you really get into it, and make better stuff, spend more effort than just "start record, say things, upload as is", you can upload everything to youtube, too. After having livestreamed the whole thing on Twitch, just to use every part of the buffalo.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is lack of monetization." As a computer user I see that as the main advantage No third party intermediary No advertising Computer users need peer-to-peer options for sharing video with each other that do not use third party advertising companies, e.g., posing as "search engine" or "social media", to transfer the bits Whether PeerTube works well, I…

the 3rd party isn't an intermediary, youtube content is fantastic because it found a way to pay people to produce something for every niche, and reward the ones doing well with more viewers and more money. ofc you would prefer high quality content delivered directly to you for free, because you're ignore the producers perspective.

And if they dare touch controversial topics it demonitises them automatically. I find it hilarious that people self censor or invent new terms (like euphemisms for suicide).

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#289
I spent 10 minutes figuring out how I could just follow a few instances without having to run a docker container on my machine or keeping N tabs open all the time.

Not a chance to figure that out (I am no mastodon user, so hard for me to guess).

These platforms are promising, but they need to remember that the average user will turn away immediately if there is no clear guidance on how to do the basic things.

Re: PeerTube is a free, decentralized and federated video platform

#290
post #41

As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. I think people who don't make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want to watch. This isn't like writing a tweet or even posting a picture on Instagram. Even a decent 20-minute video can easily take 40 man-hours of high-skilled labor. I have a pretty small…

>As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization.

That's the main benefit. Monetised content, and the people who make it, is despicable.

>and even I could not make this work if I didn't get at least $500-$1,000 per video on average, since it just takes so much time and money.

Have you considered getting a real job?

>Most channels with more than a million subscribers are likely founders working 60-80 hour weeks with multiple full-time employees supporting them.

Putting them out of business would be a fantastic turn of events.

>And yes, there are people who make content for free - most of them fail to hit a hundred views per video.

Cool and good.

>I think any real competitor to YouTube nowadays would have to be backed by a big corporation that can pay big creators million-dollar deals to make the switch.

That would be like paying a malware company to move from windows to apple.

Post reply on HN