Live data from Hacker News

Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

buchodi.com

281–290 of 311 posts

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#281

Former Facebook wanker, who worked in research. 1) we were always told and legal always pushed back hard on anything face detecting.(ie haar cascade "this is a face" let alone actual this is dave/sally) 2) the FTC would audit us to make sure we weren't doing that kind of stuff 3) all of the research prototypes had inbuilt/inline face removers up until 2024(I left after that so I don't know when/if that changed) 3.1)…

now, I will say that Boz was pushing to have facial recognition when I was were, and some of the early storyboards for XROS were pretty reilant on it (ie in an office having the sims like diamonds above your head that indicated who you were and if you were busy) I assumed that Zuck said no because he'd had enough time with the lawyer and the FTC sniffing about to not bother. However the glasses based AI lifelog stuff…

I know a few folks who work in FTC compliance roles at Meta. I don't think the wider nerd-sphere appreciates the extent to which the FTC regulates Meta following the consent order after their privacy scandals of the 2010s, or the sheer number of roles within Meta now working only on FTC related compliance. I'm sure Zuck is no doubt desperate to ramp it down.

> https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/...

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#282

Headline should be modded, these models aren't actively wired in anywhere. No idea why they'd be shipping these but the HN headline doesn't even match the blog headline.

I think it’s accurate. Facial recognition has been shipped to devices, and is all wired up, just not exposed to the average user. It’s on your device, you just haven’t been granted access to it.

Author has the word "dormant" in the headline and HN doesn't. Critical word. Let's not just support headlines when they confirm our biases.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#283
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry that you have to deal with this condition. What method do you use currently to help with recognising them?

Usually you talk to them and then you remember who they are or where you know them from. It's not like you can't tell your wife apart from your orthodontist.

I could easily tell apart all of my friends from the neck down, do you find that? Apart from height, size, gender, there's style, hair length and tons of things that make it quite possible.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#284
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My understanding is that those laws cover audio, not video.

No, you must have signage posted that you are actively video recording. That's my understanding.

It gets tricky with 1) individuals not recording for commercial purposes in 2) situations where there isn’t “a reasonable expectation of privacy.”

More importantly, you have to catch the person doing it. You’ll likely never know what they did or the harm they enabled.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#285
post #34

I can't think of one single practical use case for this that would benefit my life, because, right behind the glasses I have my very own locally available facial recognition built in.

I’m not diagnosed face blind but I’m hoooooorble with names. It’s weird because I’ve been tested and score in the 98th percentile for memory generally. I hung out with a large group of people for nearly a decade and couldn’t remember who was who until the pandemic. The names under zoom helped me gradually learn over weeks. When I teach scuba I recite the list of student names for my class in as random an order as pos…

I find writing or typing names helps a lot. There are also general tricks if you google it.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it’s accurate. Facial recognition has been shipped to devices, and is all wired up, just not exposed to the average user. It’s on your device, you just haven’t been granted access to it.

Author has the word "dormant" in the headline and HN doesn't. Critical word. Let's not just support headlines when they confirm our biases.

I don’t think it’s factually inaccurate without “dormant” in the headline. It shipped to public devices.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of people are face blind (including me), and it's extremely embarrassing, especially when I'm supposed to remember a person's name. Wouldn't wear survialiance tech to try to fix it though.

A lot of people are face blind 3.08%, according to https://hms.harvard.edu/news/how-common-face-blindness

Wow! At those odds it seems highly likely I know someone who has it and like someone else in this thread said, are good enough at piecing together the other clues that they never had to disclose it.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#289
post #247
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does tribal nepotism mean here?

Facebook.com, the OG first version, was access limited to certain higher education institutions. Like you couldn't get an account at Facebook in 2005 unless you were were a ... I don't remember ... Harvard student? Regarding nepotism: You know, "oh I remember that guy from my time at Harvard University so let's hire him" .. isn't that nepotism?

Nepotism refers to relatives, not acquaintances.

Re: Meta's ships facial recognition on smart glasses

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It worked well for the Terminator, so why shouldn't it work for us too? Being able to identify target/foe is of course how this will be used. However, I'd be much more inclined for the Black Mirror use of being able to block someone literally not just a number in your phone.

I have some vague recollection of a sketch where the user walks around and gets popups and ads in his glasses and later removes them to discover there is a calm city life around him. Was that Black Mirror?

That sounds like the Chappelle sketch "The Internet in Real Life"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4WuNU_0e5c

Post reply on HN