Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fascinating - I reproduce your failure to have Claude identify you from your writings that are already in the training set. It can identify me from style, writing about something I've never written before ( https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Jkb4CBB7rf4XYP5eb/claude-kno... , https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47814345 ), and I think I'm even more obscure if anything.
Cool! I couldn't reproduce your results, btw. 4 attempts, it answers "Sarah Constantin" in all 4. Is it possible your setup somehow leaks your name (or other identifying information) into the context?
Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
281–284 of 284 posts
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#282regardless, who stops someone from just rephrasing their messaging with a local LLM before posting online?
another example of an existing field [1] becoming more accessible through some tech.
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
Growing up on MUDs, people could clock someone on a completely different, graphical game from their text patterns.
Recognizing someone's "fist" and other patterns in their communication is part of traffic analysis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_analysis
Re: Opus 4.7 knows the real Kelsey
#284Stylometry has existed for decades, and there's no way an LLM is stronger at that job than a specialized piece of software (it's not more realistic than expecting Opus to beat Stockfish at chess). In practice, you've never been anonymous while posting on the internet and AI isn't changing anything on that front. Or rather: if anything, AI can help you become more anonymous than before, since it can be used to hide yo…
What would be an example of such software