OK, so the "Storing data in the network ... " title made me remember something. If you transmit a message to Mars, say a rover command sequence, and the outgoing buffer is deleted on the sending side (the original code is preserved, but the transmission-encoded sequence doesn't stick around), then that data, for 20-90 minutes, exists nowhere _except_ space. It's just random-looking electrical fluctuations that are pr…
Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
281–290 of 337 posts
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#282-> Rich developer spends $15k to run a model slightly faster. I love these and I know this is all in good fun, but I feel like this one is a little unfair to Jeff. He's a content creator and he didn't actually buy the rig. If he's rich it's because he creates content like this.
Jeff’s content is way too high quality to make him rich.
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#283A lot of these have a disturbingly subjective critical voice. On a topsy turvy day, one finds oneself suspecting these are human-written instead of AI.
If it’s AI, it’s very clever and nuanced: comedians should be worried for their jobs. If it’s human it’s still very funny.
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#284Aka "the titles when people post these on reddit". Now you know why HN has the "no editorializing" rule. :)
reddit is a whole different beast. It does not have a sense of humor, rather it is a biased cesspool of partisanship.
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#285He took his local well in hand; long time the perfect pose he sought. So prompted he by the decision tree, and waited while the AI Thought.
Spaghetti. Meatballs. Slurp. Will I? No. Will Smith. IYKYK
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#286"Rails developers reinventing state machines for the 50th time" Laughed so hard on this one.
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
So if we can somehow preserve the signal and make it go round and round, can we get long term storage out of nothing?
This is possible but you'd have to deploy it right by a black hole: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_sphere
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you click into the comments, it takes you to the real HN comments page with the real title
Yeah but I'd need to click each of them, thus the request for that feature.
https://github.com/fragmede/honest-hn-tooltips
Edit: Took 18 minutes.
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#289I find these kind of posts profoundly uninteresting (woah, the n-th parody of the HN front page...) and yet they seem to always garner so many upvotes...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46221900
The curiosity value of something like this diminishes under repetition, of course: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so.... It's a bit like repeating the same joke.
We downweight follow-up posts for that reason: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
That, I think, is what's going on here. This post was great—it was impressive and original enough to clear the bar, so we left it up:
Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46205632 - Dec 2025 (965 comments)
These two follow-ups are pretty good follow-ups actually—they're fun variations on the theme—but I don't think they clear the bar for another major frontpage thread:
Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46326588 (Show HN: Hacker News, but every headline is hysterical clickbait - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46324579
Re: Hacker News front page now, but the titles are honest
#290I'm not even so sure it's such a useless joke. I mean, it is, and I wouldn't want titles to be like "Academic publishers admit paywalls were a scam all along" (unless ALL major publishers actually admit it, which so far they didn't). But I clicked on "Math nerd explains how to spend 3 days proving 1+1=2" and when it turned out to be a Lean tutorial I thought "Oh, that's exactly what I wanted!". I don't know why, but…