Ironically I can't read this article due to the ongoing Cloudflare explosion.
Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
281–290 of 318 posts
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#282Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because then the ISPs have to provide support on how to secure those devices.
I will say most of the time the ISPs themselves provide the routers at residential homes
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#284> by exploiting compromised home routers and cameras, mainly in residential ISPs in the United States and other countries, Presumably it’s possible to log the residential IP of the source of these packets. Why isn’t there any industry group pushing for the ISPs to a) send the owners an email telling them or b) blocking off all traffic for a period to get them to do something - or is the economic cost higher than caus…
The economic costs of that fall on the (residential) ISPs and they aren't really incurring very much cost in additional bandwidth from the outgoing attacks. In most cases it will be 0. It's not 'good', as it could affect quality to a certain extent for other subscribers and it's theoretically possible it could result in a slightly higher transit bill, but ultimately it's just not really a problem for them. Setting up…
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#285> by exploiting compromised home routers and cameras, mainly in residential ISPs in the United States and other countries, Presumably it’s possible to log the residential IP of the source of these packets. Why isn’t there any industry group pushing for the ISPs to a) send the owners an email telling them or b) blocking off all traffic for a period to get them to do something - or is the economic cost higher than caus…
This already happens in the Netherlands, your router will be put in quarantine mode and you have to prove that the "virus" is gone This happened to me, at the time I thought it was strange but seeing this event happen it makes a lot more sense now
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
Name a few.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor https://medium.com/@aleksamajkic/fake-sms-how-deep-does-the-... https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2994 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/linux/malicious-packag... https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/04/22/phd-students-willful... I could go on but I trust this is a sufficient number of examples.
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#287Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#288> by exploiting compromised home routers and cameras, mainly in residential ISPs in the United States and other countries, Presumably it’s possible to log the residential IP of the source of these packets. Why isn’t there any industry group pushing for the ISPs to a) send the owners an email telling them or b) blocking off all traffic for a period to get them to do something - or is the economic cost higher than caus…
I would like to know if I'm serving a rogue machine and not been paying attention.
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#289Ironically I can't read this article due to the ongoing Cloudflare explosion.
Re: Azure hit by 15 Tbps DDoS attack using 500k IP addresses
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
This exchange is somewhat hilarious. Oh how on earth do we keep things safe and secure if everyone can see the code and verify what it does! Who would keep us safe if we turn our backs to unverifiable, unvetted, unprofitable security fixes, by for-profit companies!
> how on earth do we keep things safe and secure if everyone can see the code and verify what it does! That's not always the silver bullet you seem to think it is. Have you ever tried to build something like Chromium, Firefox, or LLVM yourself? It's not realistic to do that on a mid tier let alone low end device. Even when you go to the trouble of getting a local build set up, more often than not the build system imm…
Most importantly you need to pay attention to RAM usage, if necessary reducing parallelism so that it doesn't need to swap.