Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

ctvnews.ca

281–290 of 439 posts

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What capabilities? The article says the study found it was entirely correct 31% of the time.

This is what really scares me about people using AI. It will confidently hallucinate studies and quotes that have absolutely no basis in reality, and even in your own field you're not going to know whether what it's saying is real or not without following up on absolutely every assertion. But people are happy to completely buy its diagnoses of rare medical conditions based on what, exactly?

Give a single example using gpt-5 thinking.

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#282

I been using Claude for information regarding building and construction related information, (currently building a small house mostly on my own with pros for plumbing and electrical). Seriously the amount of misinformation it has given me is quite staggering. Telling me things like, “you need to fill your drainage pipes with sand before pouring concrete over them…”, the danger with these AI products is that you have…

Give a single reproduceable example using ChatGPT thinking

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#283

Last year ChatGPT helped save my life from having a stroke. LLMs are incredibly beneficial in providing medical information and advice today.

> LLMs are incredibly beneficial ... today.

LLMs sometimes can be incredibly beneficial ... today

LLMs sometimes can be incredibly harmful ... today

Non-deterministic things aren't just one thing, they're whatever they happen to be in that particular moment.

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#287
post #275
post #239

I read this not as "you can't ask ChatGPT about {medical or legal topic}" but rather "you can't build something on ChatGPT that provides {medical or legal} advice or support to someone else." For example, Epic couldn't embed ChatGPT into their application to have it read your forms for you. You can still ask it - but Epic can't build it. That said, I haven't found the specific terms and conditions that are mentioned…

(For anyone misunderstanding the reference to Epic, it's the name of an electronic healthcare record system widely used in American hospitals, not the game company Epic Games)

I was picturing a doctor AI NPC that gives you medical advice in the middle of your Fortnite game and now I'm disapointed

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#288
post #224

I wouldn't be surprised to see new products from OpenAI targeted specifically at doctors and/or lawyers. Forbidding them from using the regular ChatGPT with legal terms would be a good way to do price discrimination.

I have seen "AI" in my Dr's office. They have been using it to summarize visits and write after visit notes.

Can it become a proxy for AI companies to collect patient data and medical history or "train" on the data and sell that as a service to insurance companies.

There's HIPAA but AI firms have ignored copyright laws, so ignoring HIPAA or making consent mandatory is not a big leap from there.

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#289

Last year ChatGPT helped save my life from having a stroke. LLMs are incredibly beneficial in providing medical information and advice today.

> LLMs are incredibly beneficial ... today. LLMs sometimes can be incredibly beneficial ... today LLMs sometimes can be incredibly harmful ... today Non-deterministic things aren't just one thing, they're whatever they happen to be in that particular moment.

Non-deterministic doesn't mean random or unpredictable. That's like saying the weather forecast is useless because it's not deterministic or always 100% accurate.

Re: ChatGPT terms disallow its use in providing legal and medical advice to others

#290
post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And this seems actually wildly reasonable. It’s actually pretty scammy to take people’s money (or whatever your business model is) for legal or medical advice just to give them whatever AI shits out. If I wanted ChatGPT’s opinion (as I actually often do) I’d just ask ChatGPT for free or nearly-free. Anyone repackaging ChatGPT’s output as fit for a specialized purpose is scamming their customers.

You are failing to recognise all of the hard work which goes into "prompt engineering" to get AI to magically work!

It's the hardest work of all, it's basically voodoo, or put more generously, alchemy.

Thankfully we have progressed so this time it will probably take less than 1000 years to progress to full blown chemistry :-)

Post reply on HN