Live data from Hacker News

Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

open-web-advocacy.org

281–290 of 394 posts

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#281

Even if you get past the roadblocks Apple has put in place, it’s not beer and skittles for browser makers in the EU. The CRA, which is now in effect, lists browsers as class I important products. Technical documentation, design documentation, user documentation, security conformance testing, a declared support period at the time of download, software bill of materials, the legal obligation to respond to and make all…

Can somebody tell me if this applies to FOSS browsers?

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#282
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have two comments: First, I believe that you are correct in that small enterprises are not going to be fined out of existence (unless they continually fail to adhere to CRA requirements). The issue is that if you want to make a browser in the EU, you have to be extremely serious about it. Second, you are quoting from the section of the act that the EU uses to lay out their reasoning, justification, and thought proc…

> The issue is that if you want to make a browser in the EU, you have to be extremely serious about it. The current browser vendors have made the web so complex that this is already the case regardless of what laws do or do not impose. It's simply too large a project to implement one for any non-serious project to succeed (as evidenced by the fact that we haven't got a new browser since... Chrome. Microsoft edge sort…

True, but legal complexity and technical complexity are two very different things. I can pretty much guarantee from experience that small businesses prefer technical complexity every day of the week.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Especially because the thing he's complaining about doesn't happen on Android. Why? Probably because Android supported setting a default browser app from the beginning, while iOS forced all links to open in Safari by default.

I’m not sure the default browser setting is nearly as relevant here as how Chrome is conveniently the default browser on the overwhelming majority of Android devices, and it’s rare for users to change that. If Android shipped with Firefox or Vivaldi or something as its default browser, I’d bet anything that Google’s Android apps would do the exact same Chrome-pushing as their iOS apps.

Chrome wasn't even available until Android 4.0 (as a beta), and it wasn't included by default on most phones until later. On most Samsung devices, the default browser has been Samsung Internet for years. Starting March 2024, there is no default browser in the EEA. https://www.android.com/choicescreen/dma/browser/

Despite all of that, there are no such shenanigans on Android. The reason is almost certainly that Google had to implement such a workaround due to Apple's refusal to allow users to set default apps, and that workaround stuck.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#284
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

It's worse than that. Apple will let users set a default maps app... only in the EU https://mjtsai.com/blog/2025/03/14/dma-compliance-default-ma... The pettiness is off the charts

It's not pettiness, its just business. They want the lock in, they want the ad views they want the user data. Don't anthropomorphize your lawnmower.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#285
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apple is not serious about this. They're barely fulfilling the letter of the law here. Is that surprising in any way? They've been asked to not reject third party browser engines in the EU. Check. Google has plenty of developers in the EU so I'm not even sure what people want exactly.

they want apple adhere to EU law for everyone outside the EU lol how can people think like this

No. Apple claims they cannot implement this due to security concerns. Yet at the same time, they assure EU users that the Apple platform is of course secure. So which one is it?

By limiting this change to the EU, Apple displays that they clearly are able to add support for multiple browser engines without compromising security if forced to, so the only reason left is their unwillingness to commit to their users freedom of choice.

It’s just greed, nothing more.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#286
post #185

First of all. We must not agree that all the market will be taken by one engine (i.e. Chromium) Sadly there's no incentive for this, of course we have Firefox (still, right?) but it may perish because of underfunding for example. We used to have opera, IE, those engines are lost. So what I think about the EU directive is that it basically allows one company (Google) take over the whole market. Because what we have to…

i think it's unlikely firefox would perish. there are endless open source forks of major browsers, including FF, and even of mozilla themselves fell apart over night, people would continue to maintain. FF's real threat, as open source software, is either: 1. further capture of mozilla and intentional degradation by google to the point of obscurity 2. organizational implosion followed by google deliberating requiring…

[deleted]

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#287
post #79
post #6

This Apple policy is the only thing stopping chrome from having a full monopoly, and we should be careful trying to remove it

Maybe that wouldn't be the worst thing. Maybe chrome capturing the majority of the iOS market would finally be the proverbial straw that breaks the camel's back and pushes regulators towards forcing Google to sell Chrome.

Or… Sundar Pichai has lunch with Trump, brings with him a few nice cigars and a Google-sponsored Yacht (I hear he’s still short on these), explains to him how that’s all just a liberal media fake news campaign against good American products, and they decide to axe regulatory bodies instead.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#288
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Holy cow, they’re serious: Penalties: • Up to €15 million or 2.5 % of global turnover for essential requirement failures. • €10 million or 2 % turnover for other obligations. • €5 million or 1 % turnover for misleading or incomplete documents On the one hand, these are important standards. On the other, it seems impossible for small shops to adhere to a lot of this.

Watch them not enforce this at all whenever they need something from the US, like how they delayed (and afaik still do) heavy Google/Meta/Apple fines for DMA. Laws don't matter, only enforcement. See TikTok ban.

This is the biggeest issue that techies on HN don't understand.

These tech giants are essentially extensions of the United State's government now and fining them or imposing restrictions isn't as simple as fining any corporation due to the geopolitics at play.

The long term solution is for EU to decouple its reliance on American technology. Anything else is a bandaid IMO.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#289

Relatedly, all Google apps (e.g. Maps) on iOS try very hard to push Chrome on you (even though iOS Chrome still has to use WebKit). When you click an external link, they present you the options of Chrome, Google (the search app), or Safari. This happens even if you don't have Chrome/Google installed, so they take you to the App Store instead of opening the webpage. If you choose Safari, it still doesn't open Safari,…

I've always hated the in-app web views on iOS. They fucking suck. It's so easy to lose your state accidentally. And it confuses me later when I'm trying to find a tab I had open in the Safari app, and finally realize it was open in a stupid ass web view instead so it's gone.

Re: Apple's Browser Engine Ban Persists, Even Under the DMA

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not sure the default browser setting is nearly as relevant here as how Chrome is conveniently the default browser on the overwhelming majority of Android devices, and it’s rare for users to change that. If Android shipped with Firefox or Vivaldi or something as its default browser, I’d bet anything that Google’s Android apps would do the exact same Chrome-pushing as their iOS apps.

Chrome wasn't even available until Android 4.0 (as a beta), and it wasn't included by default on most phones until later. On most Samsung devices, the default browser has been Samsung Internet for years. Starting March 2024, there is no default browser in the EEA. https://www.android.com/choicescreen/dma/browser/ Despite all of that, there are no such shenanigans on Android. The reason is almost certainly that Google…

Even so, Chrome is still by far the dominant browser on Android, sitting at about 70%[0] between iOS and Android and higher on Android alone. There’s little benefit to be had from Google harassing Android users about browsers, and in fact it could bring users to think worse of Android, so they don’t.

[0]: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/world...

Post reply on HN