Live data from Hacker News

A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

twitter.com

281–290 of 404 posts

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#281

This is literally nothing - visualizing an org chart using D3 (a JS dataviz library), playing around with open source geospatial datasets, and a Twitter DM downloader for personal use. Look at the screenshots, not the description by this "politics reporter" who seems to be indulging in evidence-free witch hunts.

[deleted]

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How dare we call the vindictive, spiteful, name calling president currently destroying our country names! > weaponization of government against conservatives The government is clearly being weaponized against anyone who has ever opposed Trump in any way. You are in a reality tunnel.

The OP is not. He’s calling someone working on a project, posting his code to GitHub names. The correct response in a democratic society to people attacking political enemies as enemies of the state, spreading untruths, attacking the rule of law, and acting like assholes is _to not do these these things_.

I’m really baffled by this take. How are you not understanding the basic fact that these are criminals actively performing a coup to destroy the “democratic society”, not political opponents?

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#285

This is literally nothing - visualizing an org chart using D3 (a JS dataviz library), playing around with open source geospatial datasets, and a Twitter DM downloader for personal use. Look at the screenshots, not the description by this "politics reporter" who seems to be indulging in evidence-free witch hunts.

evidence free witch-hunts. Hm. I wonder where else I've seen that recently.

The DOGE staffer gets infinite chances, infinite understanding, and infinite excuses. The staffers DOGE targets, if they're lucky, get one chance to prove loyalty.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#286

Works created by U.S. federal government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain, according to 17 U.S.C. § 105, except for classified or restricted information (but none of what he posted is classified or restricted)

That is a clear misinterpretation of the law. The law says that copyright protections do not exist for government work created for a government capacity except where noted. That does not mean any of that work is in the public domain. Just because copyright protections are not available does not mean other intellectual property protections are equally void.

Here is the law text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/105

By the way it seems most of the stuff I produce for the government contains copyright notices. I don't know if those notices are valid or not, but none of the stuff I produce is in the public domain or released to the public.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#287
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He's not looking at, he's gathering

I gather things like this all the time. I'm against DOGE as much as 90% of the US is, but collection of open data for curiosity and interest is really not a thing to focus on.

The government has whole departments of people whose job it is to be on top of this sort of thing.

Why is it suddenly part of the job description of a junior DOGE employee to build workforce org chart visualization tools and investigate strategic resource datasets? Isn’t that weird to have one brand new government employee doing self-taught random investigations of topics as complex as ‘government workforce management’ and ‘strategic resource analytics’?

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable They have shown over and over that they are after a good story, not good results. They’re going for shock factor and they’re pumping out propaganda at an alarming rate. We’ve seen so many hyperbolic claims of rampant fraud with zero evidence. At the same time, they’ve had to remove the bigges…

>Numerous other claims have been shown to account for entire contract amounts, even though they only cancelled the remaining balance of the contract. They are building this live and it's been a month as a side quest. They have fixed those issues that you have said, and have been updating the website, fixing different pricing, etc. etc. every single day. They have not been preparing for months... that's not how system…

You're right we should give the people slashing budgets without thought or care more space to build their website showing they have no idea what's going on.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#289
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What was leaked? It was all publicly available datasets?

I guess the leakers didn’t know that! :D What can you do? Those DOGE staffers are young and inexperienced. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Sounds like you didn't know that either.

Re: A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his public GitHub

#290

A bit tangent, and since I’m an outsider who doesn’t live in the states and have no skin in the game — my understanding is, they will do literally anything to make sure DOGE succeeds, because a failure is basically unacceptable. I can’t even imagine how you can backtrack this, and fix stuff up. They obviously prepared for it months in advance. Targeting ex-employees of successful product companies and putting them in…

> Targeting ex-employees of successful product companies and putting them in charge (especially the ones with a lot of money, but a bit lost because they want can’t find meaning in life)

there was a post a couple of months back on HN from such a person who worked with DOGE for a bit

Post reply on HN