Live data from Hacker News

Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

arstechnica.com

281–290 of 554 posts

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#281

Why on earth would someone buy this instead of a regular PC setup, especially at that price point? There's no way I would pay that sort of money and not be able to change out the GPU and RAM, and also only have a single PCIE 4x slot.

The ability to allocate the ram to gpu is the selling point here.

If you want a swappable gpu then a APU isn’t for you

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#282
post #60

Up to 128 GB RAM available for running AI models. Theoretically awesome, but this might have some interesting market consequences for everyone else.

You’ve gotta deal with amd’s AI software stack though. How is that these days? I assume cuda is still king?

Inference fine, training less so

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#283

Why this over a traditional ATX work station? The article even points out the motherboard will fit in an ATX case, so size doesn't seem to be the major selling point. For gaming specifically, so many micro ATX motherboards offer Gen 5 PCIe, which can handle a proper video card, double the RAM, and the smaller cases are only slightly larger than this Framework.

I could see myself going for something like this for gaming actually. My gaming needs are pretty tame to the point that my current 3080Ti has been and remains overkill (usually 2+ year old titles @ 2560x1440), and as time has gone on I’ve come to value silence (which the FW Desktop seems good at, overcooling a laptop APU with a single fan desktop cooler) over raw power. In addition, the discrete GPU story continues t…

This is exactly where I'm at now. I honestly don't care about PC upgradability anymore. I buy a new cpu, motherboard, memory and gpu all at once, and I'd be more then happy to just buy it all as one integrated unit. And fan noise is also a BIG deal for me.

Between consoles and macs/macbooks, the writing is on the wall and cpu+cpu+unified memory is the future for performance. I will absolutely be looking at buying one of framework desktops instead of building a new PC soon.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#284
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With what memory bandwidth? Remember, without e.g. speculative decoding you need to read the entire model and KV cache for every token. Let's be extremely generous and say you get 512GB/sec in memory bandwidth, on par with a high end M4 MacBook Pro. This means you can only read the entire DRAM 4 times a second, generating at most 4 tokens per second. Smaller models will of course run proportionally faster, but 128GB…

> With what memory bandwidth? 256GB/sec, so roughly M4 Pro throughput.

What's frustrating is there's no real reason why regular DDR5 can't reach 1TB/sec with a sufficient number of channels. The manufacturers are just holding it back to drip feed that memory bandwidth over several generations. Except for Apple, which lets you have 800GB/sec now, and will let you have 1TB/sec+ in M5 Ultra next year. It's $$$$, but still - the true alternatives are much less cost effective.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#285
post #235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The soldered RAM is surprising for Framework, and doubly surprising for being so in a form-factor that usually doesn't have soldered RAM. Similar to what other commenters have expressed, it just seems like they shouldn't have built this product if they couldn't figure out the soldered RAM bit.

That is not a framework choice, that is an AMD architecture that doesn't use regular RAM modules as it requires wider data bus

The statement above is that one would expect Framework to have chosen a platform which does not require soldered RAM, not that Framework kept such an option by choosing this AMD part.

All that aside, I absolutely can't wait for desktops to decide to go the same route of having 4 memory channels instead of 2. Right now the only way to have >2 channels is to buy workstation/server class stuff or an APU.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#286
Tangentially related but what does a “Radeon 8060S” mean? I’m so confused what the memory bandwidth is and how much VRAM (I think it’s shared?). I was gonna buy a M2 studio for local LLM but this seems like a good choice. But I can’t figure out what the token/s would be like. I have Qwen2.5 3B running on a Mac mini M1 and it’s not great. Slow and gets stuff wrong. If I can get the 14B running with a response time below 3 seconds for Home Assistant, it would be perfect.

Edit: found it, 256 GB/s for the shared memory bandwidth

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#287

would have been cool to know about this a month ago i just built a mini ITX gaming PC for a friend, and this one looks pretty good for quality/$. good enough that i wouldn't be surprised if these get snapped up and re-sold for more than the sticker price i think it makes more sense to think of it as a high-end console, given that basically everything is soldered, though

This is a terrible gaming PC. It’s really meant for running LLMs, the main benefit is the large amount of unified graphics memory, which is not relevant to gaming.

For one thing, the price per FPS for gaming is going to be terrible. This price can get you a serious rig with much better performance.

Gaming is a very specific workload that almost entirely depends on the GPU. It is hard to even purchase a CPU that performs poorly in gaming by accident, or unless you are a hyper-specific type of gamer (like someone who plays e-sports titles and expects 300FPS for optimal reaction time, or someone who plays extremely CPU-intense games like Stellaris).

You don’t want a gaming PC with soldered GPU, even if you are using it as a “console,” even if you prioritize small size. You really want the ability to replace graphics cards because none of the other components important to gaming age out very quickly.

Here are all of the parts in my system that are older than my current graphics card (2024):

- Motherboard

- CPU

- RAM

- Power Supply

- SSD

- Case

- CPU cooler

Here is a list of those parts that are older than my previous graphics card (2020)

- RAM

- Case

- Power Supply

- Motherboard

- SSD

Here is a list of all the components that are older than the prior graphics cards before that! (Year unknown)

- Motherboard

- RAM

- Power Supply

Arguably I didn’t even need to upgrade the CPU, the cooler upgrade was necessitated by the CPU upgrade, and the case upgrade and SSD were both just personal wants and not needs.

Basically everything that matters besides my graphics card has stayed very constant but upgrading the GPU has increased my gaming performance by over 100% in the period I have described.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same. This is the first time I’ve ever seen the Cloudflare queue screen.

I waited 20 minutes. And it was worth it.

Yeah, I'm generally a big fan of theirs and I like the direction they are headed. Will be interesting to see how these pan out.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ...the first Framework Laptop 12 motherboard is going to use Intel's 13th-generation Core i3 and i5 processors I _really_ hope they launch an AMD version (perhaps with an iGPU) soon after that. That and preferably with Libreboot support. This would make it the ideal portable laptop for me and thus I'd be able to (finally!) replace my X220T.

Why would you prefer AMD? price, heat/fan noise?

i don't know about other people's experience - but my framework with intel cpu is always running that fan relatively maxed out even when it's not doing anything. And it has massive issues staying asleep which is some sort of driver issue with Windows. But I can be an airport and all of a sudden my backpack feels like it's about to combust and i can hear my laptop fan rippin', even though it should be asleep.

Re: Framework's first desktop is a strange–but unique–mini ITX gaming PC

#290

Why this over a traditional ATX work station? The article even points out the motherboard will fit in an ATX case, so size doesn't seem to be the major selling point. For gaming specifically, so many micro ATX motherboards offer Gen 5 PCIe, which can handle a proper video card, double the RAM, and the smaller cases are only slightly larger than this Framework.

Is the audience truly gamers? Presumed this was just poor journalism from ars

It's billed as "Massive gaming capability, heavy-duty AI compute, and standard PC parts, all in 4.5L." on the Framework website. And then further below it has "All the power to play all the games." And it has a dedicated "Gaming" tab with benchmarks and stuff.

So I'd say yes.

Post reply on HN