Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

theverge.com

281–290 of 776 posts

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#281
> will be two times faster [...] thanks to DLSS 4

Translation: No significant actual upgrade.

Sounds like we're continuing the trend of newer generations being beaten on fps/$ by the previous generations while hardly pushing the envelope at the top end.

A 3090 is $1000 right now.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#282
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what I'm wondering. What's the actual raw render/compute difference in performance, if we take a game that predates DLSS?

We shall wait for real world benchmarks to address the raster performance increase. The bold claim "5070 is like a 4090 at 549$" is quite different if we factor in that it's basically in DLSS only.

it's actually a lot worse than it sounds even. The 5070 is like a 4090 is when the 5070 has multi frame generation on and the 4090 doesn't. So it's not even comparable levels of DLSS, the 5070 is hallucinating 2x+ more frames than the 4090 is in that claim

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#283

Ooo, that means its probably time for me to get a used 2080, or maybe even a 3080 if I'm feeling special

The 2080 was a particularly poor value card, especially when considering the small performance uplift and the absolute glut of 1080 Tis that were available. A quick look on my local ebay also indicates they're both around the €200-250 range for used buy it now, so it seems to make way more sense to go to a 3080.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#284
post #14

Even though they are all marketed as gaming cards, Nvidia is now very clearly differentiating between 5070/5070 Ti/5080 for mid-high end gaming and 5090 for consumer/entry-level AI. The gap between xx80 and xx90 is going to be too wide for regular gamers to cross this generation.

The only difference is scalar. That isn't differentiating, that's segregation. It won't stop crypto and LLM peeps from buying everything (one assumes TDP is proportional too). Gamers not being able to find an affordable option is still a problem.

Are crypto use cases still there? I thought that went away after eth switched their proof model.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#285
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From all the communication I’ve had with Nvidia, the prevailing sentiment was that the 4090 was an 8K card, that happened to be good for AI due to vram requirements from 8K gaming. However, I’m a AAA gamedev CTO and they might have been telling me what the card means to me .

Why does 8K gaming require more VRAM? I think the textures and geometry would have the same resolution (or is that not the case? but in 4K if you walk closer to the wall you'd want higher texture resolution as well anyway, if the graphics artists have made the assets at that resolution anyway) 8K screen resolution requires 132 megabytes of memory to store the pixels (for 32-bit color), that doesn't explain gigabytes…

My understand is between double buffering and multiple sets of intermediate info for shaders, you usually have a bunch of screen size buffers hanging around in VRAM, though you are probably right that these aren't the biggest contributor to VRAM usage in the end.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#286

Ooo, that means its probably time for me to get a used 2080, or maybe even a 3080 if I'm feeling special

Why not go for AMD? I just got a 7900XTX for 850 euros, it runs ollama or comfyUI via WSl2 quite nicely.

Do you have a good resource for learning what kinds of hardware can run what kinds of models locally? Benchmarks, etc?

I'm also trying to tie together different hardware specs to model performance, whether that's training or inference. Like how does memory, VRAM, memory bandwidth, GPU cores, etc. all play into this. Know of any good resources? Oddly enough I might be best off asking an LLM.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have 128gb ram, try running MoE models, they're a far better fit for Apple's hardware because they trade memory for inference performance. using something like Wizard2 8x22b requires a huge amount of memory to host the 176b model, but only one 22b slice has to be active at a time so you get the token speed of a 22b model.

Do you have any recommendations on models to try?

Mixtral and Deepseek use MOE. Most others don't.

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#288
The increasing TDP trend is going crazy for the top-tier consumer cards:

3090 - 350W

3090 Ti - 450W

4090 - 450W

5090 - 575W

3x3090 (1050W) is less than 2x5090 (1150W), plus you get 72GB of VRAM instead of 64GB, if you can find a motherboard that supports 3 massive cards or good enough risers (apparently near impossible?).

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#289
post #156

Pretty interesting watching their tech explainers on YouTube about the changes in their AI solutions. Apparently they switched from CNNs to transformers for upscaling (with ray tracing support) if I understood correctly though for frame generation makes even more sense to me. 32 GB VRAM on the highest end GPU seems almost small after running LLMs with 128 GB RAM on the M3 Max, but the speed will most likely more than…

They are intentionally keeping the VRAM small on these cards to force people to buy their larger, more expensive offerings.

If the VRAM wasn't small, the cards would all get routed to non gaming uses. Remember the state of the market when the 3000 series was new?

Re: Nvidia announces next-gen RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 GPUs

#290
post #274
post #192

This is maybe a dumb question, but why is it so hard to buy Nvidia GPUs? I can understand lack of supply, but why can't I go on nvidia.com and buy something the same way I go on apple.com and buy hardware? I'm looking for GPUs and navigating all these different resellers with wildly different prices and confusing names (on top of the already confusing set of available cards).

One way to look at is that the third party GPU packagers have a different set of expertise. They generally build motherboards, GPU holder boards, RAM, and often monitors and mice as well. All of these product PCBs are cheaply made and don't depend on the performance of the latest TSMC node the way the GPU chips do, more about ticking feature boxes at the lowest cost. So nvidia wouldn't have the connections or skillse…

Yet the FE versions end up cheaper than third party cards (at least by MSRP), and with fewer issues caused by the third parties cheaping out on engineering…
Post reply on HN