Live data from Hacker News

All political ads running on Google in the US

adstransparency.google.com

281–290 of 354 posts

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#281

In France we limit campaign budgets to 50M$ (population adjusted) and the state fully reimburses it. US presidential campaigns are 60x more expensive per capita! Have people in the US proposed such a cap to prevent corporations from buying elections, or is that too foreign of a concept ?

There have been attempts but when corporations are considered people limitations on their "speech" all eventually fail

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#282
post #279
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's the equivalent from Meta: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=active&a...

This really interesting, but I think they have an odd idea of transparency. I searched for some ads for a congressional race in 2018, obviously inactive, and they were all there, but I couldn't view them because: "This content was removed because the disclaimer didn’t follow our policy for ads about social issues, elections or politics." For what conceivable reason would they block historical ads, ads that actually r…

Sounds like that defeats much of the purpose. One thing they definitely need to do now is to be certain to retain all that data, for future transparency and historical record.

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#283
post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Do you know something I don’t? Intuitively to me it seems like “unverified identities are usually fake” is the core tenant of post-internet media literacy.

Have you interacted with any political organizations in the last 10 years offline? If/when you interact with them online, do they claim provenance through some actual recognized body or just some vagaries around how they want to depict their alignments? If this was such a big deal, where is the hubbub about pretty much every email in my inbox? NGPVan (for instance, on the Dem side) doesn't require much except the bar…

I don't understand anything you're talking about.

Nobody likes e-mail spam from anonymous groups. NGPVan has an about page that lists who runs it with photos, they have an office and a phone number, they have a Wikipedia page. But they don't legitimize anyone else, as you seem to be suggesting.

Anonymous interference like this hasn't been a problem for a long time, contrary to your assertion -- it's very specific to this and the past two elections, because it's a tactic especially used by foreign influence like Russia. And this isn't about "demonizing enemies", it's about identifying illegal foreign influence, which is a very real thing.

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#285

In France we limit campaign budgets to 50M$ (population adjusted) and the state fully reimburses it. US presidential campaigns are 60x more expensive per capita! Have people in the US proposed such a cap to prevent corporations from buying elections, or is that too foreign of a concept ?

The state fully reimburses the campaign budget to each candidate?

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#286

In France we limit campaign budgets to 50M$ (population adjusted) and the state fully reimburses it. US presidential campaigns are 60x more expensive per capita! Have people in the US proposed such a cap to prevent corporations from buying elections, or is that too foreign of a concept ?

The state fully reimburses the campaign budget to each candidate?

Yes, if you get >=5% of the votes!

Our system isn't perfect though, it's a two-round system that has non-linearities, notably the Condorcet paradox : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_paradox

Re: All political ads running on Google in the US

#290

In France we limit campaign budgets to 50M$ (population adjusted) and the state fully reimburses it. US presidential campaigns are 60x more expensive per capita! Have people in the US proposed such a cap to prevent corporations from buying elections, or is that too foreign of a concept ?

I'm curious how France deals with external entities running influence campaigns on global platforms in this context? What prevents external entities (countries or corporations) from effectively buying elections in France?
Post reply on HN