Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

281–290 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#281

Post by [deleted] »

unnouinceput wrote: post #236
sholladay wrote: post #233

I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…

Can't you use the same account on multiple phones though? I thought this is a no brainer.

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#282

Post by jug »

shrx wrote: post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

Yeah, same here. Regarding that, this is essentially that (same LLM and all) https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-blog/...

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#283

Post by sharken »

outside415 wrote: post #274
lwhi wrote: post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. We shouldn't assume a basic sentence capitalised word refers to a product. If a reference to a product is intended, we should clarify that association some other way; i.e. MS Teams.

I thought it was referring to MS teams initially too.

Same here. Using the correct lowercase word "teams" would enable everyone to focus on the product.

Anything else is just wasting time.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#284

Post by benreesman »

pama wrote: post #278
benreesman wrote: post #66

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Thanks for the insights. What is your typical Emacs workflow for using and comparing the models?

I'm running custom stuff that I plan/hope to MIT soon, but `gptel` is killer and I've substantially plagiarized feature-wise it in my own dots. (I don't intend to release anything under a more permissive license that it was published under, merely that it sets the bar on a good interface and I plan to launch nothing less capable).

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#285

Post by Zambyte »

lhnz wrote: post #247
unnouinceput wrote: post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't you use the same account on multiple phones though? I thought this is a no brainer.

This is probably correct but I'd prefer that family don't read the conversations I've had, as even if I'm not saying anything too private, it feels too intrusive (it'd be a bit like reading my inner thoughts).

It's interesting that you're so trusting of strangers knowing your inner thoughts (OpenAI) but not your family

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#286

Post by F7F7F7 »

gbalduzzi wrote: post #208
codetrotter wrote: post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Teams is a very generic product name. Microsoft can live with the consequences of that. When I read the headline, I was not thinking of MS Teams. Because I only use MS Teams a few rare times a year. Mainly I use Zoom. But even if OpenAI had an article that with the rules of headline capitalization of HN ended up reading “Dall-E adds Zoom Feature” I would have imagined that it was about being able to zoom into picture…

> Teams is a very generic product name. Microsoft can live with the consequences of that. Quite the contrary, Microsoft earns free advertisement from this. The problem is for the people that misunderstand the heading, not for Microsoft Ok, you would understand it correctly even the Zoom example. So? Heading should be optimized for the most possible amount of people, there is a clear possibility that a lot of people m…

The vast majority of people aren’t going to make the association. Even in the HN demo.

I think people are vastly over estimating Microsoft’s ownership over ‘Teams’. Even within a tech context.

Plus, everything we’ve seen from Microsoft in their partnership with OpenAI has been Co-Pilot. Which is why I use MS Teams daily and did not make the connection.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#287

Post by F7F7F7 »

Frost1x wrote: post #245
lwhi wrote: post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. We shouldn't assume a basic sentence capitalised word refers to a product. If a reference to a product is intended, we should clarify that association some other way; i.e. MS Teams.

>We shouldn't assume a basic sentence capitalised word refers to a product. We shouldn’t but many of us do. As a title word, there’s ambiguity if it’s a proper noun or not given title styling. Given the context in this case (HN, OpenAI, ChatGPT) it was pretty difficult for my brain to not assume it was referring to Microsoft Teams so it baited me in, perhaps unintentionally. I’m not too upset about it because I knew…

When is the last time Microsoft released an AI product that wasn’t branded as Co-Pilot?

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#288

Post by [deleted] »

benreesman wrote: post #243
vincentrolfs wrote: post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I asked ChatGPT to rewrite the original post using your glossary, which worked well: I've set up my system to use several AI models: the open-source Mixtral-8x7, Dolphin (an uncensored version of Mixtral), GPT-3.5 Turbo (a cost-effective option from OpenAI), and the latest GPT-4 Turbo from OpenAI. I can easily compare their performances in Emacs. Lately, I've noticed that GPT-4 Turbo is starting to outperform Mixtral…

The GP did a great job summarizing the original post and defining a lot of cryptic jargon that I didn't anticipate would generate so much conversation, and I'd wager did it without a blind LLM shot (though these days even that is possible). I endorse that summary without reservation. And the above is substantially what I said, and undoubtedly would find a better reception with a larger audience. I'm troubled though,…

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#289

Post by diggan »

hmottestad wrote: post #263
shrx wrote: post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

I also assumed that this was ChatGPT for MS Teams. The title that the webpage uses is "ChatGPT for teams" and I believe that HN tries to use the titles from the linked page verbatim.

The title on the submitted webpage is "ChatGPT Team", singular.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#290

Post by F7F7F7 »

justincormack wrote: post #183
cald0s wrote: post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But that's how headlines work

The UK stopped capitalising every word in headlines back in the 1980s maybe earlier. It looks much nicer and is more readable. The bold tells you it is a geadline. US newspaper graphic design seems very retro to me.

The majority of designers I know prefer tile case. Whether it’s a printed poster or in-app UI.

Look no further than “Add Comment” at the top of this page.

Post reply on HN