Jesus. I asked for a woman in the jungle wearing "hiking attire" and got a woman wearing...uh...a denim g-string, denim stockings (?!), and a kind of evening-wear top. With her boobs out.
AI real-time human full-body photo generator
281–290 of 421 posts
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree it’s gross, but I’m not sure how to articulate it. It’s making real something people have done in their minds-that is imagine people with no clothes on. These pictures aren’t the actual subject naked. There’s nothing being discovered or disclosed. It’s a pure fiction. But it still bothers me.
It is fiction yes, but if it is lifelike enough does the difference matter? Even without the ick factor of making porn of someone without their consent, it would be so easy to destroy someone's career or relationship by making these deepfakes and then spreading them around. Especially once the tech gets more life-like and loses the current AI gen tells. And the same would apply to doing this the old fashioned way in…
>it would be so easy to destroy someone's career or relationship by making these deepfakes and then spreading them around.
Only because this tech isn't yet well known. People will just correctly learn to not trust anything they see online.
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.
> it feels optimized for porn So I was relatively unimpressed with the first few images, they looked incredibly unrealistic. But then after reading this message i decided to add "topless" to the notes just to see how crazy the result was. I was actually impressed, it returned an image that actually looks lifelike once I gave it an adult request. Which reinforces the idea that this was optimized for porn. For those cu…
That image is really off-putting. It looks wrong in several ways I can identify and some that I can’t.
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#284What I find sketchy is that it is not easy to find out who is behind this service. The norm is an about us or a link to a parent site. Briefly skimmed the legalese (ToS & Privacy) and still not clear who these people or where they operate from. The linkedin link shows 8 people working there, mostly in BD from outside the US. I don't think there is a nefarious purpose going on, i.e. getting people to sign up and steal…
Why's that bad? Should every URL be doxxable?
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#285Since we are already that far, I am thinking we should by law tag AI generated data in the Metadata.
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is fiction yes, but if it is lifelike enough does the difference matter? Even without the ick factor of making porn of someone without their consent, it would be so easy to destroy someone's career or relationship by making these deepfakes and then spreading them around. Especially once the tech gets more life-like and loses the current AI gen tells. And the same would apply to doing this the old fashioned way in…
Potentially the opposite. It may become more difficult to use such images to harm someone's career or relationship. Perhaps nothing is believable in the future.
I’d like to believe that this is the future. Already with the rise of digitally native relationships nudes have become commonplace (even Jeff Bezos has sent some). Now with these widely accessible deep-fake generators any leaked nude photo can be chalked up to digital malfeasance!
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#287So, not only does this generate nightmare fuel at surprising rate, but it will /happily/ generate likenesses of well-known people by just adding their name in the prompt. So, that's terrifying and probably not going to end well...
All the best,
-HG
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#288[flagged]
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#289What I find sketchy is that it is not easy to find out who is behind this service. The norm is an about us or a link to a parent site. Briefly skimmed the legalese (ToS & Privacy) and still not clear who these people or where they operate from. The linkedin link shows 8 people working there, mostly in BD from outside the US. I don't think there is a nefarious purpose going on, i.e. getting people to sign up and steal…
It could be an attempt at entrapment by a hostile foreign power attempting to get blackmail material on western engineers by tricking people into accidentally viewing CSAM, and then leveraging that to try to turn western engineers into unwilling foreign agents by blackmailing them with the threat of turning them in to law enforcement and/or ruining their marriage. I know this sounds like a conspiracy theory but this is an anonymous site, which is free to use, targeted at English-speaking engineers, which generates extremely sketchy content. Some of the comments in this thread make it pretty clear that this site generates CSAM some percentage of the time. If you use the site you are rolling the dice and might become guilty of a crime, putting yourself in a position to be a pawn of a N Korean or other foreign country's intelligence agency.
Edit: If you get contacted by a foreign intelligence agency attempting to blackmail you, please report them to https://www.inscom.army.mil/isalute/ and also to 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324).
Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.
I don't know if the thing in the crotch is a penis or a scrotum, but it is definitely NSFW: https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIill... My prompt was simply "Standing in front of a rocket.".
I had one generate a fully nude, spread eagle male model w/ a very vivid vagina when I typed in "on couch". Tried it again w/ other randomly generated male and female models with nowhere near the same results w/ any of the other tries...