Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Can't we just enjoy having nice things? Even if those things have converged aesthetically? They've converged because we think they're nice. But just because aesthetics have "converged" doesn't mean that everyone finds them pleasing. There's quite a lot of those converged aesthetics that I find unpleasant. Surely, there's still room for variety.
Things only exist if they are made. The ubiquity of this convergence then implies that those who make have similar tastes and those who have dissimilar tastes lack some fundamental capacity to construct.
It's a cost-savings measure. It also is, I think, a large reason why the modern world tends to lack aesthetic excellence.