Fundamentally, maintaining MDN is costly because of the rate of instability in rapidly changing browser APIs. Those APIs change quickly and inconsistently because they’re managed by a centralized cabal of a few corporations with a combined multiple trillions of dollars in market cap. And yet, somehow it’s Mozilla, the browser vendor with the least money, that ends up saddling the cost for MDN. Why is this? In general…
MDN Plus
281–290 of 322 posts
Re: MDN Plus
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's documented to do so, and it works for me. What part isn't working for you?
It just doesn't revert to the old download. As I said, the first thing I did when I saw the release notes was checking how to go back to the old settings. I tried that on 2 computers, both using linux (Ubuntu and PopOS), without any luck. It doesn't ask me anymore what if I want to open the file or save it.
This is the kind of change, if there were competition, I would have stopped using Firefox for good.
Re: MDN Plus
#283I'm curious how often people are needing offline access to documentation for web development.
I use Zeal. You can have super fast internet, but having instant "pop up the python docs for this thing" along with searching while typing is a joy. It's much more useful for specific API docs rather than general "how do I do X" stuff but it's very nice. Helps that you don't have to deal with scrolling through stuff like web3schools.
Re: MDN Plus
#284Nice, now can they finally stop taking money from Google? :) "The new search deal will ensure Google remains the default search engine provider inside the Firefox browser until 2023 at an estimated price tag of around $400 million to $450 million per year." "Mozilla's long-term plan is to build its own revenue streams from subscription-based services and reduce its dependence on the Google search deal" [0] https://ww…
Re: MDN Plus
#285Sailing is a long-time dream that I probably won't be able to realize in my lifetime. But, if I did ever go sailing, I would need something like parts of MDN downloaded. Doing computer work is what I love and I'm sure it's what I would use my spare time for. Clearly this has usefulness far beyond that niche case, but I love the idea that Mozilla has found a really useful thing to charge for. I hope that they can be s…
Re: MDN Plus
#286There's something in the water at Mozilla that negatively effects all product decisions. Notifications and collections are features, not a product. A viable and attractive MDN product would be a subscription to all the layers above the existing docs and guides, combined with a major initiative to connect with experts to create course material and sell it as a part of the platform. MDN: what got you here won't get you…
What is a product other than a set of features? Especially in case of a paid tier on top of an existing free service.
Re: MDN Plus
#287It seems fair enough. It won't prevent anyone from accessing the actual content and it probably makes it easy to justify paying something to MDN to employers. In practice, if you are not paying: - Bookmarks can most certainly easily replace the Collections feature - you can clone the MDN repository for having the documents offline - notifications could be computed from the commit log and the subscription probably mak…
The only thing missing from this announce is the promise that all proceeds go to MDN and nowhere else, like subsidizing a failing product or paying C-suite bonuses.
For outsiders to show up with such strong opinions like yours, it feels... weird, at the very least.
Re: MDN Plus
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only thing missing from this announce is the promise that all proceeds go to MDN and nowhere else, like subsidizing a failing product or paying C-suite bonuses.
Ring fencing funds could be a real issue for Mozilla. They desperately need new revenue streams to support their primary product (the Firefox browser) since it's non- revenue earning. I wouldn't mind these funds going towards Firefox, or even other products woth a little reluctance, but agree they shouldn't go towards other costs like bonuses or "operation costs".
> They desperately need new revenue streams to support their primary product (the Firefox browser)
No, they don't. The Corporation receives almost half a billion USD annually—over 2.5x what they were bringing in 10 years ago (when they were supporting 20+% of the world's Web browsing; for comparison, they're now at > since it's non- revenue earning
What? There's a reason why Firefox is Mozilla Corp's primary focus, you know—because it's one of the few things that does pay for itself (and then some—most of Mozilla's adventures are funded by revenue tied to Firefox).
Re: MDN Plus
#289There's something in the water at Mozilla that negatively effects all product decisions. Notifications and collections are features, not a product. A viable and attractive MDN product would be a subscription to all the layers above the existing docs and guides, combined with a major initiative to connect with experts to create course material and sell it as a part of the platform. MDN: what got you here won't get you…
> Notifications and collections are features, not a product. What is a product other than a set of features? Especially in case of a paid tier on top of an existing free service.
My take is this isn't a paid tier. It's paid features, e.g. notifications. That's not to say it provides no value, but that there is massive value being unrealized.
Re: MDN Plus
#290I have no need for any of the stuff in the supporter plan but even at $100 a year this is a total bargain. I know I don’t have to pay for it, but with the amount of value I’ve gotten out of MDN over the years it’s a steAl. I’ll buy this as soon as am back at my laptop. I have no analytics to support it, but I swear !mdn is my most used DuckDuckGo shortcut. I’m signing up as soon as I’m back at my laptop.