For who needs a summary of what is happening in the EU [1] 1. Since 2020, it's illegal to send personal data to the US because of the invalidation of the Privacy Shield [2] 2. Google said it was okay in the EU to use anonymized IP addresses 3. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) [3] ruled differently and waived most of the arguments raised by Google. The DSB ruled that even anonymized IP addresses are person…
Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
281–290 of 1001 posts
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
Filtering out bot traffic is easy enough with server logs. A self-hosted JavaScript analytics tool gives you more data, but Google Analytics filters out Firefox users too; contrary to ReCAPTCHA's apparent beliefs, Firefox users are mostly not bots.
> but Google Analytics filters out Firefox users too; contrary to ReCAPTCHA's apparent beliefs, Firefox users are mostly not bots. Isn’t it the other way around? FF by default blocks GA.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#283A lot of this seems to be coming due to US regulations that compel US registered companies to hand over data from subsidiaries in Europe markets if asked by US intelligence and law enforcement agencies. With these various data locality regulations, i wonder if a standard operating approach could be to split tech companies into 3 legal entities, a technology licensing company, a US registered operations company and a…
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#284Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok so what's the actual minimum you've said two weeks here but where is this actually defined ?
There's no hard limit here provided by the law or otherwise. Some of the local data protection offices say that they find something of "up to 30 days" reasonable, so I guess that's a good starting point. Cutting that time in half will show good faith and you'll still be able to analyze logs, I think.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#285For who needs a summary of what is happening in the EU [1] 1. Since 2020, it's illegal to send personal data to the US because of the invalidation of the Privacy Shield [2] 2. Google said it was okay in the EU to use anonymized IP addresses 3. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) [3] ruled differently and waived most of the arguments raised by Google. The DSB ruled that even anonymized IP addresses are person…
Don't be coy. Call it what it is - an analytics service.
And as such it falls largerly in the same bucket as GA, because if someone's using Simple Analytics, my surfing data - against my wishes - is being shared with some random third party. Whether it's less, more or comparably evil as GA is secondary.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#286Taking this to the logical extreme: A French website can not use any American service, right? Because any American services "are not sufficient to exclude the accessibility of this data for US intelligence services".
Indeed, a French website which keeps private information about its users must not - ethically, morally - use US services which are accessible to US intelligence agencies. That is irrespective of any legislation or court rulings, it's just common sense.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#287Earlier quoted context omitted.
or USA could just.. stop having such ridiculous law in place.
But is "Wait for a possible but incredibly unlikely series of events to occur" really a solution?
So the US needs to move here or it can not happen.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#288Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to toss some static HTML into a host, go for it. If you want to record statistics on how many page hits you had, go for it. If you want to add JavaScript for interactions and making it look prettier, go for it. But if you want to contribute to a privacy-violating network that tracks individual users, then that goes far beyond wanting "just to put up a website somewhere".
Well, you can totally contribute to a privacy violating network … so long as the data is located and processed in France. They are only tryin to keep their monopoly on government oversight which is reasonable for a governing body (our citizens = our control).
... you also have to ask for permission first.
The main difference is that for a data processor in France it seems possible to get all the right contracts in place, while a US based data processor is incapable of doing that thanks to FISA and similar US initiatives.
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#289For who needs a summary of what is happening in the EU [1] 1. Since 2020, it's illegal to send personal data to the US because of the invalidation of the Privacy Shield [2] 2. Google said it was okay in the EU to use anonymized IP addresses 3. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) [3] ruled differently and waived most of the arguments raised by Google. The DSB ruled that even anonymized IP addresses are person…
> 1. Since 2020, it's illegal to send PII (personally identifiable) data to the US because of the removal of the Privacy Shield Framework [2] Minor nit - "PII" really isn't the right term to use, because it suggests the info itself must be personally identifiable to an individual. The GDPR covers much more than this, and uses the term "Personal Data".
Re: Use of Google Analytics declared illegal by French data protection authority
#290Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some courts beg to disagree with your position: https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/31/website_fine_google_f...
Oh, wow, didn’t realize 1 website had been fined $100. The legal water is boiling!