Live data from Hacker News

App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

axios.com

281–290 of 437 posts

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#281
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> afraid that non-App Store apps will be able to install viruses or brick their devices - which isn't the case. It absolutely is the case.

You can already install malware to your device if you want to and sometimes even if you don't. Allowing other sources for installation is already build into phones.

What are you talking about?

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#283
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So what? It’s clearly not enough on its own.

When has it been not clearly enough?

Are you suggesting that iOS provides perfect security? If you think that, I am not going to bother to do the googling for you.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#284
post #97

If anyone actually thinks we’re going to be in an objectively better spot in 2 years because of this bill, I encourage you to take a real good look around at the actual world we actually live in. Things I guarantee you will see because of this: 1. You will have six different app stores on your phone. The Apple one, the Facebook one, the Google one, the Epic one, and at least two more, probably one from Disney and one…

Where are the 6 app store apps for android. Where are the app stores for Mac and PC? I can buy games for my PC from Steam, direct, green man gaming, etc etc. I can install apps that do things Apple thinks I shouldn't. The idea that having a choice of where I buy an app is a bad thing boggles my mind just because one goes in my pocket and the other sits on a desk. This fear mongering has to stop. Don't want to sideloa…

That’s because Android users are cheap! There’s no money in it. Is Google actually making money off their App Store yet?

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#285
post #155
post #69

As long as this does not cause an exodus from the App Store and I am forced to start paying for apps directly, I am fine with this. But a strong benefit to the App Store for me is being able to manage and cancel my subscriptions from a central place. No going through 5 screens, no being forced to call, no any of that crap. I can already see apps refusing to carry through the App Store so they can control more, and I…

Android offers sideloading and third-party app stores (with minor limitations), yet the vast majority of users do not sideload Android apps. I remember reading it's about 1 in 200 who does, which I found surprisingly small. Commercial apps that aren't in Google's store usually want to do something against Google's rules - sometimes for good reasons, sometimes not. I don't think you'll find many apps jumping ship enti…

The important thing is that mere existence of the option - and the possibility that if you tighten the screws too much, it can go from 1-in-200 to 1-in-20 overnight - keeps the policies and pricing of the "primary" store in check. Competition is useful for consumers even if they don't switch to a competitor, because their current vendor expects that they could, and can't freely do monopolistic exploitation.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you are right and this makes things worse don't you think people will just stick with the Apple store? No, they won’t. At a bare minimum, they’ll have the Google store and the Facebook store, and they’ll probably have a dozen others, because most people don’t actually care enough to make a principled stand on these kinds of things, but their lives will be shittier because of this, in the same way that we all hav…

> a bare minimum, they’ll have the Google store and the Facebook store Why Google and FB in particular? Because of the ad tracking thing? Note that if Apple allows sideloading, then rather than installing G/FB’s official apps you’d be able to install 3rd-party clients to their services that mitigate tracking/block ads. Currently you can’t easily do this because of App Store policy disallowing apps that violate the To…

Because Facebook and Google have the size, market power, and incentive to do it. They’re both mad at Apple over Apple’s privacy moves, they’ve got the engineering talent and scale to make it viable, and there’s not an apple device out there without at least one of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram or Gmail, YouTube, and Google Maps. Hell, I’m as ornery as they come over this crap, but even I won’t use Apple Maps.

And, what’s to keep 3rd party clients from working? The same thing that currently does: Google and Facebook control their APIs. This isn’t the era of the open internet, and that doesn’t change with an open App Store either.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#287
post #283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When has it been not clearly enough?

Are you suggesting that iOS provides perfect security? If you think that, I am not going to bother to do the googling for you.

It provides far better security than Apple critics believe. Apple haters do not trust the company’s quality of engineering.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#288
post #282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah they are.

No they aren’t. If you want F-Droid, buy an android phone. Apple can’t stop you.

Why should others go out of their way to satisfy your preferences before accomplishing what they want? If you want to get apps exclusively from the App Store, just do so. Apple will certainly keep that option available and easy to choose for you.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#289

Great news. Apple has turned the magic of software development from “how cool would this be?” to “how cool would Apple be with this?” That’s an environment of software suppression instead of free innovation, and Apple has felt little pressure to change. For anyone concerned about the security and privacy implications, don’t fall for the misconceptions perpetuated by Apple: non-App Store apps will still be sandboxed (…

If you want free innovation why not develop for PC? If Apple doesn't think free innovation is a good thing for their app store then it's Apple's loss for losing out on innovative software.

Re: App store bill sails out of Senate Judiciary Committee

#290

To those who say that if I don't sideload then this change won't affect me, I don't think this is true. Just because there aren't many alternative app stores on Android doesn't mean it won't happen on iOS. Developers will do this if there is a financial incentive. This is a forced fragmentation of the App store and will do absolutely nothing to improve the experience of a normal, non-HN-reading end user. This will in…

Not looking forward to when Verizon, AT&T, and T-mobile all decide to make app stores of their own and put them front and center.

Their first attempts pre-iPhone were very shoddy.

Post reply on HN