Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don’t need to read these books end to end. The a builds on b builds on c style of learning is only one way of learning things, and in many cases, the foundations (a, b) serve you no real value. Just jump to the sections that interest you (c) and go back to previous sections if you feel like you’ve lost track of what they’re talking about. For example, the first 20 pages of ‘Remote’ cover why remote working is goo…
Books have been written on how to read a book. Often, it’s some variant of starting with studying the table of contents then doing a fast first pass of the text. That’s usually a pretty good way of figuring out where to start.
Does that mean reading it end to end?