Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why I recommend converting from Ruby to PHP. Costs are way lower and it's easier to find devs.
Sure, and rewriting everything is easy and a piece of cake too
Usage statistics of server-side programming languages for websites
281–284 of 284 posts
Re: Usage statistics of server-side programming languages for websites
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
It looks like US adopted Ruby but in EU it never really catched the attention. EU is is still full of PHP. I don't think a lot of new companies are based on Ruby anymore seeing on how there's hardly any talk of Ruby anymore. But that's just an observation.
The Ruby dev market in Europe is hotter than ever. Of course, that's in relative terms. It's nowhere near the size of the Java, JS or even Python market size, but demand is strongest than ever and salaries show that, too
Re: Usage statistics of server-side programming languages for websites
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anecdotal search? How so, please explain.
You're searching in one website which is intended for freelancers, that's not exactly a good representation of the software industry.
Re: Usage statistics of server-side programming languages for websites
#284I wonder how much the results of this are skewed because PHP reports via the server response header that it is being used. Other languages like Elixir, Go, etc aren't so public about their usage unless one of their web frameworks adds it. I'd also love to see a study like this instead focused on "How much of the active web is wordpress?" and "How much of the inactive web is wordpress?".
The report looks at multiple variables, not only response headers, to figure out backend language.