Live data from Hacker News

“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

techrights.org

281–290 of 307 posts

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

freenode didn't use 1m in the whole 20 years it existed. Infrastructure: all sponsored Staffers: all volunteers Development: all FOSS Third party services like GitHub: all sponsored so what exactly would it have used > 1m on, please?

This is not true. As a single example, conferences cost money to throw - significant money. We did two. The FOSS community loves these events to be clear.

The attendance was what, like 50 people?

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It did until I was locked out of the dns and an internal reorganization and structure was put in place. The screenshots from former staff agenda is on the PDF. I don’t wish to be on irc 24/7 contrary to what people might or might not think.

> I don’t wish to be on irc 24/7 contrary to what people might or might not think. then why acquire freenode?

To be fair, volunteers on freenode also had lives outside of IRC.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#283
post #51
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From what I've read it seems like you generally seem to have Freenode's interests at heart, but this seems like a complete communication failure. Most channels I've been a part of have moved to Libera Chat, so I don't think Freenode in its current form can recover from this. Maybe you should consider incorporating it as a nonprofit and potentially a technology switch to Matrix? It would be nice to have a homeserver t…

> * Maybe you should consider incorporating it as a nonprofit and potentially a technology switch to Matrix? * Please don't. I like Matrix, I use it, but it's not IRC, and it's far, far more resource heavy (both in homeserver and in clients) than IRC is. You can run IRC on ancient gutless wonders, and it uses almost no resources. Matrix, especially the flagship Element client, is a resource hog. Start throwing rooms…

One (or some) of freenode staff did make it clear that freenode was a platform rather than exclusively an IRC network, which suggested that they may have had plans to look into alternative platforms in the future. And the Matrix-IRC bridge went to prove that Matrix usage is increasing, although I understand that there are a lot of people who still insist on IRC.

I'm not a huge fan of Matrix's current design or implementation, but I use it and I can understand why others do.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#284
post #221

As an outsider who hasn't used IRC or Freenode in over a decade, this situation is impenetrable. Neither the posts by the Freenode volunteers nor this post by Andrew paint a coherent narrative I can follow (maybe I'm just old). Best I can gather, the flashpoint that triggered this series of events is a dispute over the control of the freenode domain name and DNS servers?

In a weird way I sort of like the drama, reminds me of the old wild westy IRC days haha A thought occurs -- this is probably the last big IRC network drama

The drama is "interesting" but it becomes disgusting when I realise that this affects people who just want a stable communication platform and don't care about the politics.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#285
post #229
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The freenode live conference was another thing not supposed to be "part" of the network. Freenode Ltd was created for the conference purpose, not the network (according to what christel said at the time).

Yes and no? As I understand it, they weren't supposed to be involved in the day to day operation of the network in general, but back in 2016 Private Internet Access' logo (then Andrew Lee's current company) was added to the corner of the main Freenode website and as I recall it was widely discussed at the time that this was part of the deal which funded Freenode Live. Most people didn't care and it remained there unt…

> While the details are still a bit fuzzy, a far as I can tell from the outside someone on the Freenode staff seems to have used that logo switch as a pretext to try and upset the status quo and seize more power through a bogus narrative about unprecedented corporate intrusion and a logo suddenly appearing in 2021 where one would never be allowed before, likely including kicking out the then head of staff of the actual IRC network, whilst insisting that it was the other side that was trying to seize more control by obstructing them.

This is one possible interpretation. After reading a lot of these self-testimony documents I think that Freenode staffers really never knew how the organization was legally run. They only understood the internal politics of Freenode. When these two authority complexes clashed, it's predictable how disasterous the outcome would be.

That said, I'm still not buying rasengan claims about money spent. Maybe he thinks this money was spent on bettering Freenode, but unless it's money that's spent literally on keeping Freenode online, then it's hard to claim that and get the audience to agree. I think if rasengan really wants to shepherd some FOSS monolith then he need to start producing transparency documents that show exactly how he's funding things and to which organizations that money goes.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#286
post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's his name on Freenode too. I don't think that's anonymous. He very clearly reads HN, as his "Freenode is FOSS" post links PGs fierce nerds post.

I'm talking about whomever ex-fnstaffer is. That's this person's name on Freenode?

Fair enough, my fault.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#288

hmmm, the crown prince of korea owning freenode is just as believable as the queen of england contributing to the linux kernel.

No it isn't. It would be surprising if Elizabeth II bothered to personally write kernel code, but it's hardly unbelievable. Unless you're being absurdly pedantic about England-the-kingdom technically not existing because it's actually part of Great Britain/the UK now, but if so, you should probably say that.

>Unless you're being absurdly pedantic

lol

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why the anonymous account?

They value anonymity?

And for all I know, ex-fnstaffer is a tomaw alt. Do you not see the problem with all these anon new accounts that were apparently created for the express purpose of saying they don't like Andrew Lee? This reeks of astro-turfing, and for all I know it could be one person behind like 5 different accounts.

Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]

#290
post #147

No idea what this is going to change. Maybe this is an attempt to monitor and index all conversations since it's difficult to do with decentralized IRC servers? With all data gathering practices, you can bet some people see an opportunity to make money with any human data.

I am fairly confident that neither side is intent on harvesting user data.
Post reply on HN