Earlier quoted context omitted.
freenode didn't use 1m in the whole 20 years it existed. Infrastructure: all sponsored Staffers: all volunteers Development: all FOSS Third party services like GitHub: all sponsored so what exactly would it have used > 1m on, please?
This is not true. As a single example, conferences cost money to throw - significant money. We did two. The FOSS community loves these events to be clear.
“Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
281–290 of 307 posts
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#282Earlier quoted context omitted.
It did until I was locked out of the dns and an internal reorganization and structure was put in place. The screenshots from former staff agenda is on the PDF. I don’t wish to be on irc 24/7 contrary to what people might or might not think.
> I don’t wish to be on irc 24/7 contrary to what people might or might not think. then why acquire freenode?
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what I've read it seems like you generally seem to have Freenode's interests at heart, but this seems like a complete communication failure. Most channels I've been a part of have moved to Libera Chat, so I don't think Freenode in its current form can recover from this. Maybe you should consider incorporating it as a nonprofit and potentially a technology switch to Matrix? It would be nice to have a homeserver t…
> * Maybe you should consider incorporating it as a nonprofit and potentially a technology switch to Matrix? * Please don't. I like Matrix, I use it, but it's not IRC, and it's far, far more resource heavy (both in homeserver and in clients) than IRC is. You can run IRC on ancient gutless wonders, and it uses almost no resources. Matrix, especially the flagship Element client, is a resource hog. Start throwing rooms…
I'm not a huge fan of Matrix's current design or implementation, but I use it and I can understand why others do.
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#284As an outsider who hasn't used IRC or Freenode in over a decade, this situation is impenetrable. Neither the posts by the Freenode volunteers nor this post by Andrew paint a coherent narrative I can follow (maybe I'm just old). Best I can gather, the flashpoint that triggered this series of events is a dispute over the control of the freenode domain name and DNS servers?
In a weird way I sort of like the drama, reminds me of the old wild westy IRC days haha A thought occurs -- this is probably the last big IRC network drama
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#285Earlier quoted context omitted.
The freenode live conference was another thing not supposed to be "part" of the network. Freenode Ltd was created for the conference purpose, not the network (according to what christel said at the time).
Yes and no? As I understand it, they weren't supposed to be involved in the day to day operation of the network in general, but back in 2016 Private Internet Access' logo (then Andrew Lee's current company) was added to the corner of the main Freenode website and as I recall it was widely discussed at the time that this was part of the deal which funded Freenode Live. Most people didn't care and it remained there unt…
This is one possible interpretation. After reading a lot of these self-testimony documents I think that Freenode staffers really never knew how the organization was legally run. They only understood the internal politics of Freenode. When these two authority complexes clashed, it's predictable how disasterous the outcome would be.
That said, I'm still not buying rasengan claims about money spent. Maybe he thinks this money was spent on bettering Freenode, but unless it's money that's spent literally on keeping Freenode online, then it's hard to claim that and get the audience to agree. I think if rasengan really wants to shepherd some FOSS monolith then he need to start producing transparency documents that show exactly how he's funding things and to which organizations that money goes.
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#286Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's his name on Freenode too. I don't think that's anonymous. He very clearly reads HN, as his "Freenode is FOSS" post links PGs fierce nerds post.
I'm talking about whomever ex-fnstaffer is. That's this person's name on Freenode?
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#287The fact that this statement was delivered as a PDF tells us all we need to know.
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#288hmmm, the crown prince of korea owning freenode is just as believable as the queen of england contributing to the linux kernel.
No it isn't. It would be surprising if Elizabeth II bothered to personally write kernel code, but it's hardly unbelievable. Unless you're being absurdly pedantic about England-the-kingdom technically not existing because it's actually part of Great Britain/the UK now, but if so, you should probably say that.
lol
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#289Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why the anonymous account?
They value anonymity?
Re: “Setting the record straight on Freenode” [pdf]
#290No idea what this is going to change. Maybe this is an attempt to monitor and index all conversations since it's difficult to do with decentralized IRC servers? With all data gathering practices, you can bet some people see an opportunity to make money with any human data.