Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interviews aren't the only cost of hiring. Onboarding is very expensive for knowledge workers.
Onboarding is expensive at dysfunctional organizations. Further, the reality that churn is high among better employees [1] offsets the concern. But regardless, going through an extensive vetting process is an illusion. It has extraordinarily little correlation with actual work fit or productivity, but the more "rigorous" the process, the more likely you are to stick with a poor fit. [1] - low performers will hang aro…
Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
281–290 of 418 posts
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#282If you expect the interesting work to land in your lap you are either one of those people that redefine (maybe invent) entire fields of research or you're incredibly lucky. In other words, your work speaks for itself and people want to give you more of it. For most people we need a job in order to keep up with the rising costs of living. If, however, you're like 99.99% of people and are good at what you do then you'l…
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#283Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure if this is still the case, but at least back then (10+ years ago), quite a few people working helpdesk and IT (system admin, network admin, etc.) were CS majors. Or at least it seemed so from my own network. CS was seen as the gateway degree to any kind of computer related career, not just SWE. Are things different now? I am actually not a CS major - I'm an information systems major. Funny enough, anothe…
> Are things different now? For me personally, if I were going to go into some other IT fields tomorrow, I’d skip the expensive ass degree period. A lot of IT feels closer to a modern trade than anything.
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#284Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#285I have nice boring job. Few years ago I was upset with the boring part. But with kids and mortgage I don’t really care anymore. I am very happy to be paid more than a manager in a small company being only individual contributor in big Corp. I also have approval to sell my hardware from big Corp. So I can explore new things with commercial potential without a fear. Life is good.
Stability and work life balance are terribly underrated.
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#286Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#287I’ve been on the receiving end of similar requests before. “I’ll work for free or nothing if you let me do what I love under the umbrella of your organization because I love it so much.” I did one or two agreements like this and then stopped altogether. The individual would start their work, others would start to depend on its existence and the individual would leave in a matter or weeks or months because something e…
Seems like a weird idea to me anyways, to offer to work for very little money or even nothing, as long as the work is interesting. To me it seems that time is much better spent on a fun personal (side) project. And who knows ... maybe the side project will earn some income in time.
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#288Anything is interesting if you engage with it. And being bored is a state of mind. It's a fallacy to say "that's boring". The bored-ness is in your head, not in the task.
Re: Hire me and pay what you want, just give me interesting work
#289Anything is interesting if you engage with it. And being bored is a state of mind. It's a fallacy to say "that's boring". The bored-ness is in your head, not in the task.
I don't know... Have you ever done manual QA as a full time job?
I grew up on a farm. There was a lot of that. It took mental discipline, which most folks may not have an opportunity to develop in this hypercharged media world.