Earlier quoted context omitted.
HN tends to devalue the individual, and value the content. (E.g. high quality comment by a not famous person) Twitter seems to value the individual, but devalue the content. (E.g. low quality posts by a famous person) The former is more meritorious, inasmuch as the vote base can accurately judge a comment. The latter is more consistent, in that popular people stay popular (and admittedly, are popular for a reason). P…
Thats an interesting observation. Username based forums value the content, while Twitter (where your identity is public) values the individual and his/her expertise. The issue with the former is that it relies on upvotes of people from the community. This leads to the problem of people upvoting comments on topics in which they lack expertise (ie developers upvoting comments about astronomy that "sound right") This re…
E.g. if someone versed in cryptography upvotes or downvotes a cryptography story/comment, that counts for more than someone random
And I only care because the expertise gap is really the only flaw in HN/Reddit style ranking. In all other ways, it seems superior.