281–290 of 426 posts
A service designed to get tweets to a larger audience. But Twitter banned the account that was working to put this standard into practice @shareU
Ironically Twitter has been, historically; the most restrictive force in social media.
To those of you pushing for ActivityPub: Webber's trashed it (the initial author) and is working on a way to mitigate the problems of it by implementing incompatible changes, the biggest piece of software claiming to implement it doesn't even implement it (Mastodon), the only piece of software that stays semi-faithful is full of devs who hate it (Pleroma). AP is completely broken for anything but publicly-scoped cont…
Thank you for saying this. ActivityPub is so wrong in so many ways, and still people keep pushing it as if it was a silver bullet. I think people who talk about it and think it's very good never tried to understand it or write something with it.
Gosh I hope they buy pleroma. Compared to mastodon and gab it's objectively the best decentralized Twitter.
Definitely the best ActivityPub software on the market!
Why not ActivityPub?
because it's not built on crypto, and Jack wants to control a new coin a la Libra
This brings to mind the (truthfully) quite useless Minds.com social network. Twitter doesn't NEED a blockchain. Just look at Pleroma, Mastodon, or Gab to see p2p twitter replacements that are blockchain-free.
I wonder if he realizes how terrible Twitter is for long form writing and publishing like this when he does it. It’s always baffled me why they haven’t removed the character limit entirely and instantly become the largest networked publishing platform that’s ever existed over night.
i like the character limit. Twitter is a telegraph office, not a magazine. he kinda has to use these threads himself, because it's his company. Hopefully his new system will suppport dual "excerpt/full text" publishing, because i 'd hate my feed to be full of 3 page articles instead of TL-DRs
"Twitter is a telegraph office" -- but should it be?
Look at ATOM/RSS, they are telegraph offices too, yet they don't have character limits. ActivityPub services like Pleroma also are "telegraph offices" without strict character limits yet they don't seem to suffer for it. In fact it's much more pleasant to use Pleroma for this reason, you have the freedom to express complete thoughts.
It's RSS. Twitter invented RSS.
While it's probably just an extension of Jack's obsession over blockchain, it's a bit interesting that you'd have to use Twitter to apply: there are a few truly-decentralized/or federated solutions that have been proposed and have an active userbase, and the authors of the good stuff don't tend to be on Twitter. For example, one of the people working on one of the most prominent pieces of software implementing the Ac…
"the value of social media is shifting away from content hosting and removal, and towards recommendation algorithms directing one’s attention" I really wish I could hack on the youtube recommendation algorithm. It seems to be tuned for zombie viewing pleasure, and totally not for finding surprising new content. Even just having several "personas" would be a big help.
I'd love a feature that defaults the next video to the newest unwatched video in a given channel or something like that, but we all know why it won't be built.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank you for saying this. ActivityPub is so wrong in so many ways, and still people keep pushing it as if it was a silver bullet. I think people who talk about it and think it's very good never tried to understand it or write something with it.
I don't think people are pushing ActivityPub as a silver bullet, so much as they're using it as "the currently-available and less-awful alternative to closed silos". If someone is starving, they're not going to hold out for a gourmet cheesecake that's a year away from being made. They'll happily take an immediately-available baked potato instead.
"the value of social media is shifting away from content hosting and removal, and towards recommendation algorithms directing one’s attention" I really wish I could hack on the youtube recommendation algorithm. It seems to be tuned for zombie viewing pleasure, and totally not for finding surprising new content. Even just having several "personas" would be a big help.
The problem is the revenue model. Zombie viewing is more profitable than surprising new content. If you were asked to hack on YouTube's algorithm, any modifications you'd produce, no matter their merit, would be tested against the status quo for their ability to generate revenue.