Live data from Hacker News

U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

reuters.com

281–290 of 361 posts

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"However, in the long term 15-20 years, I would imagine, China would have fully caught up with the US particularly on semiconductor design and fabrication. Once that happens, the dominance of the US tech stack will start to falter and eventually erode away. " Are you assuming the U.S. will sit stagnant during these 15-20 years? If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Their best…

Apparently China is already leading the world as far as AI goes (I first saw this in Mary Meeker’s internet report this year I think it was and she usually links to the research in her slides). I read somewhere that Chinese scientists found it easier to get Chinese government funding for bold and ambitious research (and I imagine they’d also have other “advantages” given how the country is governed). So I wouldn’t be…

This is not completely true. China lead in terms of AI startup funding, but due to the huge shortage of talents, a good number of startups don't hold much water.

The top Chinese talents (e.g. Kaming He, Fei Fei Li etc) all chose to move to the US. AFAIK, there are no Chinese institutions that employ elite foreign AI researchers. The US universities and companies still lead with a large margin in terms of high impact publications in NIPS, ICML, CVPR etc.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know but from a science point of view all our last research are based on paper coming from people at China companies (Alibaba, Tencent), that currently have the edge in our specific domain (machine learning). So yes in domains that mainly require your brain they have caught up if not ahead.

Alibaba has an edge in machine learning? The CEO of Alibaba is palpably clueless about anything relating to do with machine learning and I haven't seen any evidence that anyone else at the helm of the org is any better. Watch Elon Musk try really hard not to cringe at the shit Jack Ma says on the topic of ML. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3lUEnMaiAU

Daniel zhang is the ceo, get your facts right and daniel is way savy in tech than jack ma.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doubt it. China has yet to invent a new class of technology not copied/stolen from Europe or US. There are very good ar perfecting technologies developed elsewhere.

Not yet. But 20 years ago, we weren't having this conversation of China even being seen as a threat. Back in the day, China was simply and exotic communist land that the West exploited for cheap manufacturing. Now it's appearing to be going down the path of militarily deterring the US and competing in the tech field.

>Not yet. But 20 years ago, we weren't having this conversation of China even being seen as a threat.

Twenty years ago, Japan was the "threat" and the zeitgeist was full of tropes of Japanese technology taking over the world.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"However, in the long term 15-20 years, I would imagine, China would have fully caught up with the US particularly on semiconductor design and fabrication. Once that happens, the dominance of the US tech stack will start to falter and eventually erode away. " Are you assuming the U.S. will sit stagnant during these 15-20 years? If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Their best…

> If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Yes, no lesson from world history is more obvious and robust than "once in the lead, always in the lead".

Like all the historic civilizations that peaked and fell apart ?

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Yes, no lesson from world history is more obvious and robust than "once in the lead, always in the lead".

Like all the historic civilizations that peaked and fell apart ?

my reading of the OP is that was exactly the point

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Yes, no lesson from world history is more obvious and robust than "once in the lead, always in the lead".

Like all the historic civilizations that peaked and fell apart ?

The comment you replied to was sarcastic.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not yet. But 20 years ago, we weren't having this conversation of China even being seen as a threat. Back in the day, China was simply and exotic communist land that the West exploited for cheap manufacturing. Now it's appearing to be going down the path of militarily deterring the US and competing in the tech field.

>Not yet. But 20 years ago, we weren't having this conversation of China even being seen as a threat. Twenty years ago, Japan was the "threat" and the zeitgeist was full of tropes of Japanese technology taking over the world.

Japan wasn't run by a dictator, didn't have tens of thousands of people from a particular religious group placed into concentration camps, or owned so much stock in particular US companies that they can get those very same US companies to bend over to their demands.

It's not the same, and you know that.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like all the historic civilizations that peaked and fell apart ?

The comment you replied to was sarcastic.

I thought it might be since it's so obvious but discussing a similar topic with coworkers a few days back had a similar situation where someone just frames the argument in a time window that explains their narrative - I wouldn't be surprised if someone argued this because of the US economic dominance post WW2

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"US was already shown to be behind in 5g, China is already caught up." So the mainstream media and politicians would have us believe. "Heck they even helped AMD catch up to Intel, and see what sort of major success that was ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD%E2%80%93Chinese_joint_vent... . ) " All I see here is an agreement for AMD to transfer technology to China, for x86 chips destined for chinese-only server marke…

I don't know but from a science point of view all our last research are based on paper coming from people at China companies (Alibaba, Tencent), that currently have the edge in our specific domain (machine learning). So yes in domains that mainly require your brain they have caught up if not ahead.

Machine learning is a wide field. Could you give some examples of research you've done based on papers that came out of Alibaba, Tencent, etc.? I'm curious.

Re: U.S. widens trade blacklist to include some of China’s top AI startups

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"However, in the long term 15-20 years, I would imagine, China would have fully caught up with the US particularly on semiconductor design and fabrication. Once that happens, the dominance of the US tech stack will start to falter and eventually erode away. " Are you assuming the U.S. will sit stagnant during these 15-20 years? If China is 15-20 years behind currently, I doubt they will ever be at parity. Their best…

The lack of IP law in china will allow them to progress much much faster.

China does have IP law, and the big companies sue each other for copyright infringement all the time, e.g. https://technode.com/2019/04/26/baidu-bytedance-lawsuits-con...

There's a lot of talk about political censorship in China, but the majority of the content I've seen removed was not political, but in violation of copyright.

What China does not have is a legal system that is both able and willing to stop all instances of copyright infringement (or most other crimes, for that matter). So you get a lot of small-scale operations flying under the radar for as long as possible and vanishing as soon as they risk punishment.

Post reply on HN