Live data from Hacker News

Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

namepros.com

281–290 of 435 posts

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, rather than saying “Google it” maybe we can now say “Duck it”.

I just say "web search it." Same syllables as Google. Devoid of any brand preference.

Same syllables sure but there has to be a hard stop between the two syllables since b and s can’t be strung together.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#282

I'm quite surprised there's no .go tld, I could see it being used quite a lot.

Two-letter TLDs are ccTLDs, and all the existing countries already have their ccTLDs. In order for this to happen, you'd need to have a new country spring into existence that can plausibly be abbreviated to .go, and then they would have to treat it like a faux-generic (like .io) instead of imposing registration/use restrictions as some countries do for their ccTLDs.

I love how you can still buy .su (Soviet Union) domains.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#283
post #182

reminder that most praise you find about DDG in popular online communities (e.g. HN, Reddit, /g/, etc...) is mostly by their own paid influencers and shills, Weinberg even bragged about it once on Quora and deleted it later. The only question that he cares about: what's his exit number?

I mean .. that's really no different than anybody else's marketing tactics. You should read up on Edward Bernays; the father of manipulative advertising.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#284

NamePros user, Thelma, made a good point: > The story of Microsoft floating a significant loan to Apple in order to keep Apple solvent in the late '90's is well-known. Microsoft didn't do so out of altruistic impulse; they did so to decrease the odds they'd be the target of anti-trust legislation. I'm sure the c-suite at Google is very aware of that history lesson, and you'd be hard-pressed to find a more likely anti…

Damn, that makes it seem like less of an olive branch and more of a cover-your-ass move. Either way, it's still a boon to DDG! (or just D?)

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#285
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's like Duck Duck Goose

Or was it duck goose goose? :) duck.com!

The game where you tap tap two heads and all 3 of you run in a circle. At least two people collide and are knocked out. The 3rd gets the website they wanted.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#286

Nice! Now DuckDuckGo needs to just change their name to Duck Search and it can be used as a verb. No longer will you have to say "Did you DuckDuckGo it?" and can instead say "Did you Duck it?". Even on the domain alone I will use Duck more since I won't have to type in the full DuckDuckGo.com domain. I _feel_ like this could really bring some measurable growth to Duck search. I _feel_ like I certainly will use it mor…

Finally, someone will actually mean to type "ducking," and it won't just be autocorrect.

I envy anybody whose autocorrect suggests swearing.

For me it’s a constant battle of teaching and reteaching it the different manners of expressing passion and frustration. That’s the one thing I liked about Google’s keyboard on Android: that you could enable “sailor-mouth mode”. They called it something boring though like “Suggest profane words”.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#287
According to wikipedia,

   On2 Technologies, formerly known as The Duck Corporation...
So it all makes sense now and all the conspiracy theories about Google's ownership proven false. And kudos to Google for transferring a high value domain ownership out to a competitor!

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#288
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love DuckDuckGo and use it on all my devices, but, WOW what a horrible name/branding. What were they thinking? Every time I mention/recommend it to someone the response is always a blank stare followed by something along the lines of “I would never use that if only to avoid that horrible name / brand URL”. And I can’t say I blame them.

Maybe it's a geographic thing? I feel like anyone who grew up in a region where duck, duck goose was a common game for children to play wouldn't be too confused about the name. Not that being confused about the name or disliking it is a bad thing. But I like the name, and it's part of the reason I chose to start using DDG. If they changed it to something more generic, I'd be less likely to keep using it because I'd f…

I played the game as a child, and so the reference wasn’t lost on me the first time I encountered DuckDuckGo – yet I recall my first reaction being “wow, what a clumsy, awkward name.”

It’s cute, but it’s antithetical to the idea of becoming a household word.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#289

Nice! Now DuckDuckGo needs to just change their name to Duck Search and it can be used as a verb. No longer will you have to say "Did you DuckDuckGo it?" and can instead say "Did you Duck it?". Even on the domain alone I will use Duck more since I won't have to type in the full DuckDuckGo.com domain. I _feel_ like this could really bring some measurable growth to Duck search. I _feel_ like I certainly will use it mor…

My iPhone is constantly autocorrecting "fucking" to "ducking" no matter how many times I write the former and never write the latter, so this could be a huge thing.

Me: "Ducking Donald"

Siri: "Duck Search found a McDonald's two blocks away, should I reserve you a table?"

Post reply on HN