Live data from Hacker News

Prison time, hefty fines for data privacy violations: draft U.S. Senate bill

reuters.com

281–285 of 285 posts

Re: Prison time, hefty fines for data privacy violations: draft U.S. Senate bill

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So is the only difference between lying and knowingly misleading the point in time of the subject in question?

> the only difference between lying and knowingly misleading the point in time of the subject in question? If I say “this stock will rise in value” and then it doesn’t, that isn’t lying. If I say that while knowing the CEO is committing felonies, it still wouldn’t be lying, but it would be problematic. If I say “this is a share of Apple” when it’s actually Twitter, that’s lying. Bad forecasts aren’t lies, they’re mis…

> If you look at every security the agencies rated AAA, they performed as expected in cash flows.

Why do you think Moody's agreed to pay an almost $900 million settlement over allegations that they inflated the ratings of toxic securities?

Re: Prison time, hefty fines for data privacy violations: draft U.S. Senate bill

#284
post #275
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Internet tax

Sooo to be clear... Your theory is: 1. Large companies by insurance for data privacy violations 2. They then lobby to repeal H.R. 3086 (Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act 3. They then lobby for another bill for taxation on internet use. 4. Then they lobby for what would be equivalent to a hand out in order to recoup losses.

I don’t think it would be that hard. Lots of pieces of pie for all involved. It may just happen wait and see

Re: Prison time, hefty fines for data privacy violations: draft U.S. Senate bill

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is charging a (reasonable) fee 'denying the service'?

Possibly. Under GDPR, if your data processing is based on user consent, then that consent must be given freely. That means you should provide equivalent service, regardless of consent being given. Providing one service for free and another for a fee is not equivalent, so I'd argue that such consent would be invalid, as it was not freely given. However, consent is only one of several conditions for processing data. An…

Thanks a lot for the insight, wasn't familiar with the GDPR logic. I think it'd be very hard to make a business case for processing non-paying users only so it's pretty easy to understand the consent option now.
Post reply on HN