Live data from Hacker News

Linus Torvalds on aliasing

yodaiken.com

281–284 of 284 posts

Re: Linus Torvalds on aliasing

#281
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Fork it and make your own Even Google couldn't pull that off with Android.

Just wait and see. https://www.techradar.com/news/google-fuchsia

That's less "fork Linux" (which Google found to be unmaintainable, not to mention non-ideal from a licensing standpoint) and more "screw you guys, we're making our own kernel with blackjack and hookers".

Re: Linus Torvalds on aliasing

#282
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good code or not, if he doesn't agree with the reason to merge it, why merge it?

Because the code is OK, but the _rationals_ in the commit message (union aliasing is bad) are not. This is for history. If someone, later, say: "We should use union aliasing to fix this", someone would argue "No, we shouldn't because we already states _there_ that union aliasing is bad". You can't consider a such amount of code like the kernel one without its commit history. Here Linus explain why union aliasing is n…

But if he doesn't agree with the commit message, then asking for an altered PR with a different commit message is surely the way to go. Having to trawl the mailing list for maybe-happened-discussions seems like a stupid way to organize things. Maybe I just don't know how they structure the kernel development and documentation.

Re: Linus Torvalds on aliasing

#283
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Swearing in general doesn't damage morale, but swearing at and verbally abusing someone does very much so. That's exactly the kind of treatment that would lead me, if I were a developer, to walk away from the project. In fact, here's an edit which gets his point over in less words, and more clearly: "Honestly, this looks questionable to me. [U]sing a union to do type punning is the traditional AND STANDARD way to do…

And that's the reason PR exists. To translate text written by "knowledgeable person, who writes in not acceptable to everyone language" into "language acceptable to everyone". This also leads to no more direct contact between public and those people and the eternal cries of "we only get PR speak!!" The chances that you get to hear things from the source and never hear things in a way you don't like is almost zero. Yo…

Which part of my abridged version missed vital technical details or changed the fundamental meaning of what Linus said? It's not PR speak, it's treating others with dignity. Linus seems to think that isn't important. He'll be programming the Linux kernel with only AI for companions at this rate.

Re: Linus Torvalds on aliasing

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's also people who throw fits with little provocation when they don't like things, which sounds fitting to me. Seriously, the thing gets merged anyway but he has to "express himself"

I found your post aggressive. Will you please change it to appease me?

I see what you're doing, and it doesn't make any sense. I just said I didn't like a pointless display of emotion, and so you do a "satirical" emotional appeal?
Post reply on HN