Live data from Hacker News

German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account

reuters.com

281–284 of 284 posts

Re: German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account

#281
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If they're all keeping their racist opinions to themselves, I might waste a bunch of time being their friends I have several friends who I know hold some less-than-sociable opinions, and they do tend to keep them to themselves. I don't quite know how to frame what I'm about to say, but I feel it's equally dickish to think that becoming someone's friend is a "waste of time" just because you don't agree with their op…

To be fair being racist is more than an opinion, it demonstrates your character. It reveals part of who you are and the framework with which you deal with the world. I agree that it is valuable knowledge in determining who you want to create lasting bonds with.

I'll agree with the latter assertion (framework), but not with the former (character). People tend to default to conformism when they don't know any better.

By that standard the older the man, the worse he is and you'll arrive at the conclusion that nearly everyone flawed character in the olden days when racism was mainstream.

But we need not even go any further than Charles Darwin:

"The variability or diversity of the mental faculties in men of the same race, not to mention the greater differences between the men of distinct races, is so notorious that not a word need here be said."

"Nor is the difference slight in moral disposition between a barbarian, such as the man described by the old navigator Byron, who dashed his child on the rocks for dropping a basket of sea urchins, and a Howard or Clarkson; and in intellect, between a savage who uses hardly any abstract terms, and a Newton or Shakspeare. Differences of this kind between the highest men of the highest races and the lowest savages, are connected by the finest graduations."

http://heretical.com/darwin/darwin4.html

Sources cited at the bottom of that page.

Re: German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account

#282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There is nothing contentious to debate about. The FDP, CSU, AfD and indeed large parts of the CDU want to have a debate about immigration. The CSU represents around half of Bayern, some 6 million people. The FDP, CDU, and AfD together represent 56% of the votes in the last election. Even prominent voices on the left want a debate: Sigmar Gabriel, who until recently was head of the SPD, wants to have a debate. Sahra…

The planet where 'having a debate about immigration' and calling for 'the trains [to auschwitz]' for immigrants are two different things. Additionally, the AfD (who are the ones complaining about censorship all the times) don't actually want to have any debate at all, because they kinda have no content. They just play the fear of the masses and want to display themselfes as victims of the majority or whoever.

Trains to Auschwitz?

Weren't they already in concentration camps? https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2015/01/31/germany-housin...

Re: German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account

#283
post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Front_National Nevertheless, and notwithstanding the racist murders committed by some members (see Brahim Bouarram thrown in the Seine, and Ibrahim Ali, shot), the FN continued its progress and even managed to gain some towns in 1995, such as Toulon and Orange, where, once more, such mayors managed to show their crass incompetence[3] and got booted in 2001 by the electors. Source for B…

Thank you for your answer. That could be constructed as racist hate crime by party "supporters" (not even members), and could have nothing to do with the party itself. On the other hand, since it align with the party's ideology, it can be said that the FN has a part in it. But I don't see how it shows that the FN has murdered any politicians, which was what I was asking about

> That could be constructed as racist hate crime by party "supporters" (not even members), and could have nothing to do with the party itself. On the other hand, since it align with the party's ideology, it can be said that the FN has a part in it.

If your political party is inspiring murders, the party is at fault for that.

Re: German hate speech law tested as Twitter blocks satire account

#284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Your tone is hostile and that makes me disinclined to take your view. >Don’t let your biases inform your opinions! These are not complimentary positions, they're pretty exclusive of each other. Methinks you just wanted to take the high ground with some generic platitude and misdirect the conversation.

They can’t be exclusive of each other if I successfully hold both at once

Yes they most certainly can and are.
Post reply on HN