Live data from Hacker News

P&G Cuts More Than $100M in ‘Largely Ineffective’ Digital Ads

wsj.com

281–282 of 282 posts

Re: P&G Cuts More Than $100M in ‘Largely Ineffective’ Digital Ads

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not hyperbole. Having the majority of content producers be unable to continue operation would be a blow the Internet has never seen. Massively destructive. Nothing would come close that’s happened before.

If no-one is willing to pay for their 'content', then it isn't worth anything anyway. The Internet did just fine without corporate advertisers running the show and tracking everybody for years.

You mean in the early to late 90s? Because advertising has been running the show at many levels since the early 2000s.

If you don't think regressing the internet back 20 years would be massively destructive... well, I can't help you.

Re: P&G Cuts More Than $100M in ‘Largely Ineffective’ Digital Ads

#282

I think other companies might come to the same conclusion and also reduce their ad spending. We're in an advertising bubble just like the dot com bubble except this time it's not stock prices that are frothy, it's the advertising revenue itself.

I said before that printing money using basic income would only inflate it. Ads are designed to increase consumption, and we have a debt-based economy.
Post reply on HN